HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 2025-2634CITY OF THE COLONY
ORDINANCE NO. 2025- ZO314
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE
COLONY, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-52 OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS" BY REDEFINING
THE TERM "CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN"; AMENDING
CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-64(B) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES,
ENTITLED "ROADWAY IMPACT FEE," BY UPDATING THE
ROADWAY IMPACT FEES FOR ROADWAY FACILITIES BASED UPON
AN AMENDED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PLAN; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR SAID
ORDINANCE TO TAKE IMMEDIATE EFFECT.
WHEREAS, Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes the imposition
and collection of roadway facilities impact fees for eligible capital improvements and facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the City of The Colony, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), has
previously adopted land use assumptions, capital improvements plan for roadway facilities impact
fees; and
WHEREAS, Section 395.052 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the City to
conduct a periodic update of the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan; and
WHEREAS, the City contracted with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc., to perform a
Roadway Impact Fee Update, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit
A, as amended, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, as
amended, notices have been published, public hearings have been held and the written
recommendations received concerning land use assumptions and Roadway Impact Fees, which is
identical to the capital improvements plan prepared by a qualified professional engineer; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the citizens of the City
to adopt such land use assumptions and roadway impact fees established herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF THE COLONY, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. That the findings set forth above are found to be true and correct and are
hereby incorporated into the body of this Ordinance for all purposes as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 2. That Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances be, and the same is, hereby
amended by amending Section 8-52, entitled "Definitions" to read as follows:
"Sec. 8-52. Definitions.
Capital improvements plan means a plan contemplated by this article that identifies capital
improvements or facility expansions for which impact fees may be assessed. The said plan is dated
September 2025 and entitled "Roadway Impact Fee Update", as prepared by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. and on file in the office of the city secretary.
SECTION 3. That Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances be, and the same is, hereby
amended by amending Section 8-64(b), entitled "Roadway Impact Fees" to read as follows:
"(b) Roadway impact fees.
(1) The land use assumptions ("LUA") and the roadway impact fee update, which is identical
to the capital improvements plan ("CIP"), prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc., dated
September 2025 and entitled "City of The Colony Roadway Impact Fee Update", which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes as Exhibit A, together with all its amendments,
exhibits and appendices, are hereby approved. Exhibit A is not set out herein but is on file and
shall be maintained in the office of the city secretary and available for inspection. The LUA and
roadway impact fee established herein shall be reviewed and updated at least every five (5) years.
(2) The roadway impact fee contained in Table 8 to be charged is attached hereto and
incorporated herein for all purposes.
SECTION 4. The methodology for roadway impact fees, including the service area,
service units, cost per service unit, and service unit calculation shall be provided in Chapter III of
Exhibit A.
SECTION 5. Impact fee calculations, which shall include maximum assessable impact fee
per service unit, plan for awarding the roadway impact fee credit, and service unit demand per unit
of Development shall be as provided in Table 9 of the referenced report.
SECTION 6. Any construction of, contributions to, or dedications of off-site roadway
facilities agreed to or required by the City as a condition of development approval shall be credited
against roadway facilities impact fees otherwise due from the development.
SECTION 7. A record must be made and kept of the public hearings conducted as provided
by this chapter and maintained and made available for public inspection for at least ten
(10) years after the date of the hearing.
SECTION 8. This section is adopted pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government
Code, as amended. The provisions of this section shall not be construed to limit the power of the City
to utilize other methods authorized under State law or pursuant to other City powers to accomplish
the purposes set forth herein, either in substitution or in conjunction with this section. Guidelines may
be developed by City Council resolution or otherwise to implement and administer this section.
SECTION 9. The provisions of this section apply to all new development within the
corporate boundaries of the City.
SECTION 10. No application for new development shall be approved within the City
without assessment of an impact fee pursuant to this article, and no building permit shall be issued
unless the applicant has paid the roadway facilities impact fee imposed by and calculated hereunder.
SECTION 11. Following the lapse or expiration of approval for a plat, a new assessment
shall occur at the time of final approval of a new plat.
SECTION 12. An application for an amending plat made pursuant to Section 212.016 of the
Texas Local Government Code, as amended, and the Subdivision Regulations, is not subject to
reassessment for an impact fee.
SECTION 13. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the words,
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any word,
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional
by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall
not affect any of the remaining words, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this
Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation of
this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 14. Any provision of any prior ordinance of the City, whether codified or
uncodified, which is in conflict with any provision of this Ordinance, is hereby repealed to the extent
of the conflict, but all other provisions of the ordinances of the City, whether codified or uncodified,
which are not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 15. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE
COLONY, TEXAS, THIS 16th DAY OF DECEMBER 2025.
ATTE
Tina Stewart, TRMC, CMC, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Richard -Boyer, Mayor
City of The Colony, Texas
ExhibitA
Roadway Impact Fee
Report
Exhibit B
Roadway Impact Fee
PREPARED FOR:
THE
C LUNY
Cite by the Like
PREPARED BY:
Kirnley))) Horn
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Phone: 817 335 6511
TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928
Project Number: 061117030
The Colony, Texas
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
September 2025
r(if,nTvv
Prepared for:
The Colony
Prepared by:
Kimley o Horn
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Phone: 817 335 6511
TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928
Project Number: 061117030
WOPPp"'pp-
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ...............................................
Executive Summary ............................................
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
��'TLDNY
Page No.
I. Introduction..........................................................................................................................
i
II. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs.............................................................................2
A. Land Use Assumptions..........................................................................................................................2
B. Capital Improvement Plan......................................................................................................................8
III. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees...........................................................................10
A. Service Areas.......................................................................................................................................10
B. Service Units.........................................................................................................................................10
C. Cost Per Service Unit....................................................................................................
....................11
D. Cost of the CIP.....................................................................................................................................11
E. Service Unit Calculation.......................................................................................................................16
IV. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation......................................................................................19
A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit...........................................................................19
B. Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit............................................................................21
C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit Development......................................................................................23
V. Sample Calculations..........................................................................................................26
VI. Conclusion.........................................................................................................................27
APPENDICES..........................................................................................................................28
A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections.........................................................................................28
B. CIP Service Units of Supply.................................................................................................................28
C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory .................................................................................................28
Kimley>>)Horn
WQPPPPWP_
List of Tables
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
JJ 'Coro
Table 1. Residential and Non -Residential Growth Projections.................................................7
Table 2. Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees................................................8
Table 3. Level of Use for Roadway Facilities
(used in Appendix B and Appendix C).................................................................... 10
Table 4. 10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
with Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections....................................................15
Table 5. Transportation Demand Factor Calculations............................................................17
Table 6. 10 -Year Growth Projections......................................................................................18
Table 7. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation................................19-20
Table 8. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee...........................................................22
Table 9. Land Use / Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table(LUVMET).................................... 24-25
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 — SH 121 Corridor Service Area.................................................................................4
Exhibit2 — Future Land Use Plan.............................................................................................5
Exhibit 3 — SH 121 Corridor Service Area with Aerial...............................................................6
Exhibit 4 — Roadway Impact Fee CIP.......................................................................................9
List of Examples
Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Housing .............................26
Example 2: Development Type —125,000 square foot Home Improvement ........................26
KimlepMorn ;;
www"""_
Executive Summary
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
CTHE
OLONY
cry a.• � �
Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. They
originated and evolved in Florida, California and other fast-growing municipalities and counties, primarily in the
Southern and Western United States. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks,
schools, roads, and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for water, wastewater, roadway, and
drainage facilities. Impact Fees are currently being used to fund public water and wastewater improvements,
drainage improvements, and as well as funding roadway infrastructure in the City of The Colony.
In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of each new unit of development in
terms of new infrastructure needs. In the case of roadway impact fees, the infrastructure need is increased capacity
on arterial and collector roadways. The purpose of this Impact Fee Study Update is to identify the fee per unit of new
development necessary to fund these improvements in accordance with the enabling legislation, Chapter 395 of the
Texas Local Government Code,
Impact Fees are a one-time fee, and are charged only against new development. They are based on the cost of the
capacity improvements necessary to accommodate new growth. For roadway impact fee purposes the City has one
(1) service area. A service area is a geographic area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All
fees collected within the service area must be spent on eligible improvements within that same service area.
Impact fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time
of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Impact fees are
collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development impacts are
introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same
service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Impact Fees. An
Advisory Committee must review the Land Use Assumptions, CIP, and resulting maximum fee. Once feedback is
provided to City Council on these items, a public meeting is to be held prior to adoption.
This report includes details of the impact fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable
Land Use Assumptions, development of the CIP, and the Land Use Equivalency Table.
The 2025 maximum assessable roadway impact fee calculated in this report is $1,052 per vehicle -mile. This is $816
more per vehicle -mile from the 2016 maximum fee, which was $236 per vehicle -mile.
Kimley>Morn
1V1100F,-
1. Introduction
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
COLONY
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas cities must follow in order to
create and implement Impact Fees. Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) amended Chapter 395 in September 2001 to define an
Impact Fee as "a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to
generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by
and attributable to the new development."
Chapter 395 mandates that impact fees be reviewed and updated at least every five (5) years due to changes in the
Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Accordingly, the City of The Colony has developed its
Land Use Assumptions and CIP with which to update the City's Roadway Impact Fees from June 2016, The City has
retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2025
update of their Roadway Impact Fees. This report includes the details of the Roadway Impact Fee calculation
methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the CIP, and
refinement of the Land Use Equivalency Table.
This report introduces and references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee:
1. Land Use Assumptions
2. Capital Improvement Plan
Information from the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvement Plan is used extensively throughout the
remainder of the report.
This report consists of a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees and is broken
down into two components:
1. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees
2. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation
The components of the Methodology for Roadway Impact Fee includes development of:
• Service Area
■ Service Units
■ Cost Per Service Unit
• Cost of the CIP
• Service Unit Calculation
The components of the Roadway Impact Fee Calculation include:
• Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
• Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development
This report also includes a section concerning the Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit. This plan
details the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit the City of The Colony may apply under Chapter 395 of
the Texas Local Government Code.
The final section of the report is the Conclusion, which presents the findings of the update analysis and summarizes
the report.
Kimley>>)Horn
wqpppppo�
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
II. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Inputs
A. Land Use Assumptions
Purpose and Overview
�� I �L,,N'Y
is rr, h7 the lake
In order to assess an impact fee, Land Use Assumptions must be developed to provide the basis for population and
employment growth projections within a political subdivision. As defined by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code, these assumptions include a description of changes in land uses, densities, intensities, and
population in the service area. In addition, these assumptions are useful in assisting the City of The Colony in
determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development.
In accordance with Chapter 395, information from the following sources was compiled: the City of The Colony
Comprehensive Plan — March 2023, the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), and consultation
with City staff.
The components of the Land Use Assumptions include the following:
• Methodology — An overview of the general methodology used to generate the land use assumptions;
• Impact Fee Service Areas — Explanation of the division of The Colony into service areas for roadway
facilities;
■ Population and Employment — Data on population and employment within the service area for the base
year (2025) and growth projections over the next ten years (2025 — 2035); and
■ Land Use Assumptions Summary — a synopsis of the land use assumptions.
The population and employment estimates and projections were all compiled in accordance with the following
categories:
Units: Number of dwelling units, both single and multi -family,
Population: Number of people based on person per dwelling unit factors,
Employment: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications. Each classification has
unique trip -making characteristics.
Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households
and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector, such as grocery stores, and
restaurants.
Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government
and other professional administrative offices.
Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those exported outside the
local economy, such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade,
warehousing, and other industrial uses.
Kimley>Morn
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
�1 COLONY
C'Rp M• the Lake
2. Methodology
The population and employment growth projections formulated in this report were done using reasonable and
generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections:
• Character, type, density, and quantity of existing development;
• Current zoning plans;
• Future Land Use Plan (as currently adopted March 2023);
■ Growth trends;
• Location of vacant land; and
• Physical holding capacity of The Colony.
Existing population and employment data was compiled using field and aerial survey of existing development. For the
remaining undeveloped areas, assumptions based upon existing development patterns and the future land use plan
were utilized. Consultation with City staff helped to determine the Build -Out year to be 2035.
Impact Fee Service Areas
The geographic boundary of the existing impact fee service areas for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 1. The
remaining portions of the City outside of this service area will not have a Roadway Impact Fee assessed for new
development and were not considered in this analysis.
It should be noted that at locations where the service area boundary follows a thoroughfare facility (e.g. North Colony
Boulevard), the proposed boundary is intended to be inclusive of the entire ROW of the facility. This distinction is
significant in establishing the Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact Fees in later sections of this report.
4. Population and Employment
Population and employment estimates for the base year (2025) were performed based upon a survey of the existing
land uses. Build -Out projections were prepared based upon combining the existing land uses within the service area
with reasonable assumptions for undeveloped land based upon the current Future Land Use Plan. Ten-year growth
projections were prepared based upon consultation with City staff regarding the Build -Out year, which was assumed
to be 2035. Exhibit 2 presents the current Future Land Use Plan and Exhibit 3 displays the proposed SH 121
Corridor Service Area boundary and aerial photography. Table 1 summarizes the population and employment
projections within the SH 121 Service Area for 2025 and 2035 (Build -Out).
Kimley>>)Horn
IL
T_S
all
li 41;-
ry
Exhibit I -
COTLI 1(5N Y SH 121 Corridor
*m�, T. �.-, - - Service Area
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
September
September 2025 Kirriley Horn
Legend
Streets
f
SH 121 Corridor Sewf.
Area
City U.Its
Exhibit I -
COTLI 1(5N Y SH 121 Corridor
*m�, T. �.-, - - Service Area
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
September
September 2025 Kirriley Horn
A CTHE Exhibit 2 -
��� Future Land Use Plan
September 2025 KlmleyOHorn
Legend -
S.n --�� —streets — Nel�bort+ood —
fY'�~ Commercial/Office
Government Parks
Low Density Residential Public/Semi Public
Main Street/Lake Residential Ell _
A.—fflewshed SN 171 Corridor
— Medium Density De�rlo7trrarlt
— Residentlal Urban Corridor
Mixed Urban Vacant
Development
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
Table 1— Residential and Non -Residential
Growth Projections
�► COLONY
After examining the demographic projections developed for the service area, a number of observations can be made.
Overall growth within the SH 121 Corridor Service Area is limited. A majority of the residential areas within SH 121
Corridor Service Area are already built out. The remaining growth is projected to consist of primarily multi -family
areas along SH 121. Based upon the City's Land Use Plan, the primary source of future population growth will be
outside the studied service area.
Employment growth within the City is projected to occur primarily along the SH 121 Corridor. These growth trends
are also consistent with the Future Land Use Plan.
5. Summary
The SH 121 Corridor Service Area is projected to build -out over the next ten years. This is consistent with the Future
Land Use Plan in the Service Area, which consists of primarily non-residential land uses and a few mixed-use areas.
As a result of this analysis, the following summary statistics were compiled for the Service Area:
• The Existing (2025) population is approximately 24,586.
• The Existing (2025) employment area is approximately 9,908,000 square feet.
• The Build -Out (2035) population projection is approximately 26,879.
• The Build -Out (2035) employment area projection is approximately 10,761,453 square feet.
KimleyoHorn
Non -Residential (Square Feet)
Year Population
Units
Basic
Service
Retail
Total
SH 121
2025 24,586
9,384
2,017,000
887,000
7,004,000
9,908,000
Corridor
2,043,965 962,000
7,755,488
10,761,453
Service
2035 26,879
10,259
Area
After examining the demographic projections developed for the service area, a number of observations can be made.
Overall growth within the SH 121 Corridor Service Area is limited. A majority of the residential areas within SH 121
Corridor Service Area are already built out. The remaining growth is projected to consist of primarily multi -family
areas along SH 121. Based upon the City's Land Use Plan, the primary source of future population growth will be
outside the studied service area.
Employment growth within the City is projected to occur primarily along the SH 121 Corridor. These growth trends
are also consistent with the Future Land Use Plan.
5. Summary
The SH 121 Corridor Service Area is projected to build -out over the next ten years. This is consistent with the Future
Land Use Plan in the Service Area, which consists of primarily non-residential land uses and a few mixed-use areas.
As a result of this analysis, the following summary statistics were compiled for the Service Area:
• The Existing (2025) population is approximately 24,586.
• The Existing (2025) employment area is approximately 9,908,000 square feet.
• The Build -Out (2035) population projection is approximately 26,879.
• The Build -Out (2035) employment area projection is approximately 10,761,453 square feet.
KimleyoHorn
WWFO,1P-
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
Ij THE
csr,• m• � 1.ak¢
B. Capital Improvement Plan
The City has identified the transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the service
area. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Roadway Impact Fees is made up of the following:
■ Recently completed projects with excess capacity available to serve new growth;
• All remaining projects needed to complete the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan; and
• CIP intersection projects.
The CIP includes arterial and collector class roadway facilities as well as intersection improvements. All of the
facilities are part of the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan.
The CIP for Roadway Impact Fees for the 2025 Impact Fee Update are listed in Table 2 and mapped in Exhibit 4.
The table shows the length of each project as well as the facility's Master Thoroughfare Plan classification. The CIP
was developed in conjunction with input from the City of The Colony staff and represents those projects that will be
needed to accommodate the growth projected.
Table 2 — Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
Service Area
Proj. #
Class
Roadway
Limits
Length % In
Service
(mr) Area
1
4U -B 1/2
S. Cad Blvd. 1
Lakeshore Blvd to Westport Dr
0.15
100
2
6D 1/3
S. Colony Blvd, 2
Main St. to Paige Rd
0.99
100%
3 4D -C S. Colony Blvd 3) Paige Rd. to Bear Run Rd. 0.16
100%
4 6D I/3 S. Colonv Blvd (4) Paige Rd. to Memorial Dr 0.53
100%
5 4D -C S. Colonv Blvd. Ove ss 350' N of SH 121 SBFR to Grandsca Blvd 0.32
100%
6
4D -C
Memorial Dr. 1)
Stan dridge Dr. to 570' W. of Main St.
0.66
100%
7 4D -C Memorial Dr. 2) 570' W. of Main St. to Main St. 0.11
100%
8
6D 1/3)
Memorial Dr. 3)
Main SL to City Limits
2.45
100%
9 4D -C 1/2 Memorial Dr. 4 Blau Oaks Dr. to Paige Rd. 0.63
100%
10 4U -A 1/2 Standrid a Dr. 1 510'N of Memorial Dr. to 245' S of Cedar Ride Ct. 0.24
100
I 1 6D 1/3 Standrid a Dr. (2) emorial Dr. to 510' N of Memorial Dr. 0.10
100%
12
8D 1/4)
Main St.
Cougar Aly to S Colony Blvd.
0.46
100%
SH 121 Corridor
13
6D -B & 8D -A
Paige Rd
SH 121 to S. Colony Blvd
0.83
100%
14 4U -A 1/2 Morningstar Dr. Crestwood Ln. to N. Colonv Blvd 0.33
100%
15 4U -A Blau Oaks Dr. SH 121 to Memorial Dr. 0.17
100%
16 4D -C1/2) Memorial Dr. (5) Pai e Rd to 840' E. of Paige Rd 0.16
100%
17
6D 1/3)I
Memorial Dr. (6)
Standrid a Dr. to 570' W. of Main St.
0.66
100%
18 4D -C Memorial Dr. 7) W Dr to S. Colony Bhd 0.30
100%
IntersCcsinn !m cments
1.1 - SH 121 Deceleration Lanes i Paige Rd. - SB
100%
I-2 SH 121 Deceleration Lanes 1 Morring Star. - SB
100%
I-3 SH 121 Deceleration Lanes (1) Blau Oaks Dr. - SB
100%
1-4
Paige Rd./Nash Dr. & Paige Rd/Norris
Nash Drive to Norris
100%
I-5
Standridge Dr & Memorial Dr
Standridee Dr. / Memorial Dr Signal
100
I-6 S Colonv Blvd / Floor & Dccor S Cnlonv Blvd / FI Decor Sienal -
100%
Kimley>>)Horn
u
Heys
m �
~ 3 4 ASO � ' -tr � .� r•_
f f:
/ I
I I
l ■
r f
r-
�N
Legend
Thoroughfare Fadlldes
SH 121 Corddw Sen i e
Completed pr jem
Area
Wdening projects
aN umia
r j Median Lane Projects
. irfte caon
IInprWam
- Slme6
GSO�
r V
ca
e`
I
,C iT �r Exhibit 4:
�-+ Roadway Impact Fee CIP
Miles
September 2025 KimleyoHorn
wvppp,pp�
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
III. Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees
A. Service Areas
11 COLONY
The SH 121 Corridor Service Area used in the 2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update is shown in the previously
referenced Exhibit 1. This service area covers only a portion of the corporate boundary of the City of The Colony.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is limited to an area within the
corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles." Note that the SH 121 Corridor
Service Area was limited to four (4) miles.
B. Service Units
The "service unit" is a measure of consumption or use of the roadway facilities by new development. In other words,
it is the measure of supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined
as a vehicle -mile.
Another aspect of the service unit is the service volume that is provided (supplied) by a lane -mile of roadway facility.
This number, also referred to as capacity, is a function of the facility type, facility configuration, number of lanes, and
level of service. Below is the definition for vehicle -mile.
Vehicle -Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in
length. The PM Peak is commonly used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused
by new development.
Total Vehicle -Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour)
(see Appendix B).
Total Vehicle -Miles of Demand: Based on the 10 -year growth projections. The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate
(trips) * Trip Length (miles).
The hourly service volumes used in the Roadway Impact Fee Update are based upon Thoroughfare Capacity Criteria
published by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). Table 3 shows the service volumes as a
function of the facility type.
Table 3 — Level of Use for Roadway Facilities
(used in Appendix B and Appendix C)
Roadway Type
(MTP Classifications)
Median Configuration
Undivided
Hourly Vehicle -Mile Capacity 1
per Lane -Mile of Roadway
Facility
425
2U -C — Minor Collector
4U -A — Major Collector
Undivided
475
4U -B — Minor Collector
Undivided
475
4D -C — Minor Arterial
Divided
650
6D -A — Major Arterial
Divided
700
6D -B — Minor Arterial
Divided
700
8D -A — Major Arterial
Divided
700
Kimley>Morn 10
C. Cost Per Service Unit
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
JJ,C, THE
A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the
Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle -mile of travel. This cost per service unit is the cost to construct
a roadway (lane -mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle -mile of travel at a level of service corresponding to the
City's standards. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on a specific list of projects
within that service area.
The second component of the cost per service unit is the number of service units in each service area. This number
is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period. Chapter 395
requires that impact fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur in the City limits within the next ten -
years, a concept that will be covered in a later section of this report. As noted earlier, the units of demand are
vehicle -miles of travel.
D. Cost of the CIP
The costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are all of the implementation costs for the Roadway
Impact Fee Update, as well as project costs for thoroughfare plan elements within the Capital Improvement Plan.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are "... including and limited to
the:
1. Construction contract price;
2. Surveying and engineering fees;
3. Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney's fees, and expert witness
fees; and
4. Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing
or updating the Capital Improvement Plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision."
The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the CIP is based, in part, on the calculation of a unit
cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for
the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of
facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project, In addition, based upon discussions with
City of The Colony staff, State, County, and developer driven projects have been included in the CIP as lump sum
costs where the City has contributed a portion of the total project costs. The following is a detailed description of the
costing worksheettmethodology for the Roadway Impact Fee CIP.
Overview of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Worksheets
For each project a specific costing worksheet was developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contained the
following four (4) main components:
Project Information,
Construction Pay Items,
• Construction Component Allowances and
• Summary of Costs and Allowances
An example costing sheet showing these four components is provided on the following page.
Kimley>>)Horn
k'fVPPPPPP
Roadway Impact Fee Update THE
1� The Colony, Texas OLONY
September 2025 Ct't, 1=1
The Colony KimleyHomand Associates, Inc.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated: &2112025
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Name: S. Colony Blvd. (1) This project cons,t: oflire
Limits: Lakeshore Bled to Westport Dr construction ofthe southem two lanes
Project Information Impact Fee Class: 4U -B (1/2) of an ultimate four4ane undivided
Ultimate Class Minor Collector section.
Length (If): 770
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Construction Pay
Items
Construction
Component
Allowances
Summary of Costs
and Allowances
Kimley>>)Horn
Roadway
Construction • Projection
No.
Item Description
Quantity 11 nit I Unit Price
Item Cost
110
Unclassified Street Excavation
1,027 cy $ 32.001$
32.854
-$i—
210
8" Grade A. Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
1,968 sy $ 36.00
70,848
310
7' Concrete Pavement
1,925 sy $ 74.00
5 142,450
410
4' Topsoil
685 sy $ 12.00
$ 8,220
501
Concrde Driveway Approach J
i ea $ 4,000.00
5 4.000
—
Paving ConStrJction Cost Subtotal:
S 258,382
Yr -7-116m pone at A] I owances":
Item Description
Notes Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4ek
S 10,335
4
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 150/o
$ 38,757
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$ 7,751
4
Roadway Drainage
Standard htemal System 35%
$ 90,434
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated $0
$ -
4
Water
Minor Adjustments 2%
$ 5,168
4
Sewer
Minor Adluslmenls 5%
$ 12,919
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$ 12.819
J
Illumination
Standard lumimtion System Eek
$ 15,503
Other.
$0
8
^Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Sublolal Allowance Subtotal:
S 193,786
Paving and Aftowance Subtotal:
S 652.168
Construction Conlirlgency:1 I5°/
$ 67,825
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$ 520,000
Item Description Notes: Allowance Item Cost
Construction: - $ 520,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing: 20% $ 104,000
Mobilization Eek $ 31,200
ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acqu-stion Costs included 0% $ -
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL: $ 655.000
IIOTEThe planning level cost projections listed in Ihs appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be
used fo any future Capital Improvement Planning w thin the Cly of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the city's design standards contained w dhi n the Subdivision Ordinance,
Engineering Design Manual, or the determination of the Cly Engineer for a specific project
12
2. Project Information
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
�d COLONY
Ciq• by th. Lak.
In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified:
• Project Number — Identifies each project with a corresponding number. The corresponding number
does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects.
■ Name — A unique identifier for each project.
• Limits — Represents the beginning and ending location for each project.
• Impact Fee Class — The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the
width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable, based on the
proposed Thoroughfare Plan classification of the roadway. Additional classifications are utilized in
cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened. The following
notations are used for these projects:
o "(1/2)" for facilities where half the facility still needs to be constructed;
o "(1/3)" for future six -lane major arterials facilities where two additional lanes are needed
o "(1/4)" for future eight -lane major arterials facilities where two additional lanes are needed
• Ultimate Class — The functional classification on The Colony's Thoroughfare Plan.
• Len th ft — The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project.
• Service Area(s) — Represents the service area where the project is located.
• Description — Used to describe the project type assumed in the costing such as a widening or
reconstruction.
Construction Pay Items
A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including the following: planning, survey, design
engineering, permitting, right -of way acquisition, construction and inspection. While the construction cost
component of a project may actually consist of approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach
was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. Each new project's construction cost was
divided into three cost components: roadway construction cost, major construction component allowances,
and summary of cost and allowances. The roadway construction components consist of the following pay
items:
1. Street excavation
2. Flex base
3. Concrete pavement
4. Topsoil
5. Concrete driveway approach
Kimley>>)Horn 13
4. Construction Component Allowances
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
JA
OL,,N'Y
A percentage of the paving construction cost is allotted for various major construction component
allowances, as appropriate, These allowances include preparation of right-of-way, traffic control, pavement
markings and signage, roadway drainage, special drainage structures, incidental water and sewer
relocation, illumination, and landscaping and irrigation. These allowance percentages are also based on
historical data.
The paving and allowance subtotal is given a fifteen percent (15%) contingency to determine the
construction cost total. Lump sum dollar allowances are provided for intersection improvements where
needs are anticipated.
Summary of Cost and Allowances
To determine the total Impact Fee Project Cost, twenty percent (20%) of the construction cost total is added
for engineering, surveying, and testing. An additional six percent (6%) of the construction cost total is added
for mobilization. Note that costs associated with right-of-way/easement acquisition was not included as part
of the impact fee projects.
The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is the Construction Cost Total plus engineering, surveying, testing, and
mobilization.
Table 4 summarizes the CIP project list for the SH 121 Corridor service area with conceptual level cost projections.
Detailed cost projections and methodology used for each individual project can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual
Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual -level opinions or
assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are potentially recoverable through impact fees. Actual
costs of construction are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that
cannot be precisely predicted at this time.
This CIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Essentially, it establishes a list of
projects for which an impact fee funding program can be established. This is different from the City's construction
CIP, which provides a broad list of capital projects for which the City is committed to building. The cost projections
utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City's building program or construction CIP.
Kimley>))Horn 14
Roadway Impact Fee Update THE
The Colony, Texas COLONY
September 2025 Ciq �, the
Table 4 —10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
with Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
Pro! it
Class
Roadway
Limits
Length Service
(mi)
In
Area
Total Project
Cost
Cost in Service
Area
1
4U -B 1/2)
S Colonv Blvd 1)
Lakeshore Blvd to Westport Dr
015
100°/
$ 655000
$
655,000
2
6D (1/3)
S Colony Blvd (2)
Main St to Pai a Rd
099
100%
$ 3,760,000
$
3.760 000
3
413-C
S Colony Blvd 3
Paige Rd to Bear Rim Rd
016
100%
$ 393,553
$
393,553
4
1 6D 1/3
S Colony Blvd 4)
Paige Rd to Memorial Dr
0.53
100%
$ 030000
$
2.030.000
5
4D -C
S Colony Blvd Overpass
350' N of SH 121 SBFR to Grandsca a Blvd 032
100%
S 5.132.914
$
5 13Z914
6
4D -C
Memorial Dr. 1)
Standrid a Dr to 570'W of Main St
0.66
100%
$ 1,730,726
S
1,730,726
7
4D -C
Memorial Dr (2)
570' W of Main St to Main St
Oil
100%
S 370,009
$
370.009
8
6D 1/3
Memorial Dr 3)
Main St to City Limits
245
100%
S 9.33500 S
9,335,000
9
4D -C(1/
Memorial Dr (4)
Blair Oaks Dr to Paige Rd.
0.63
1001/.
$ ]36971
$
136971
10
4U -A 1/2)
Standrid a Dr (1)
510'N of Memorial Dr. to 245'S of Cedar Ride Ct. 0.24
100%
S 1 426000
S
1,426.000
11
6D (1/3)
Stardridee Dr (2)
Memorial Dr to 510'N of Memorial Dc
0.10
1001/6
$ 333,000
S
373,000
12
8D (1/4)
Main St
Cougar Aly to S Colony Blvd
0.46
100%
$ 352,600
$
352.600
13
6D -B & 8D -A
Paige Rd
SH 121 to S Colony Blvd
0.83
100%
S 3560302
S
3,560,302
14
4U -A (1/2)
Mominestar Dr
Crestwood Ln to N Colony Blvd
0.33
100%
$ 1 9] 000
$
1,991,000
15
4U -A
Blair Oaks Dr
SH 121 to Memorial Dr
017
10T/
$ 2,020,000
$
2.020,000
16
4D -C (IQ
Memorial Dr 5)
Paige Rd to 840' E of Paige Rd.
016
100%
$ 12),706
S
121.706.
17
6D (1P3)
Memorial Dr (6)
Standrid a Dr to 570'W of Main St.
0.66
100%
$ 14000
S
2514000
18
4D -C
Memorial Dr. {7)
Wvlcv Dr to S Colony 131W
0.30
10056
S 870$93
S
$70.993
Intersection F mpovements
1.1
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes { 1)
PW Rd - SB
100%
S Z75=
S
75,0W
I-2
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes 1
Morning Star - SB
-
100%
$ 275,000
$
275,000
I-3
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes 1)
Blair Oaks Dr - SB
-
100%
S 275,000
$
275,000
I-4
Paige Rd Mash Dr & Paige Rd/Norris
Nash Drive to Norris
-
100%
$ 600000
$
60D.000
I-5
Standridge Dr & Memorial Dr
Standrid a Dr. / Memorial Dr Signal
I O(P/o
$ 379 45
$
379,545
1-6
S Colmy Blvd/ Floor & Decor
S Colony Blvd / Floor & Decor Signal
100%
S 401,664.
S
401.664
Service Area Project CoM Subtotal
S
3&979,883
Roadway Impact Fee Study Cost
S
45,490
Total Cost in SH 121 CORRIDOR SERVICE AREA
$
39,025,373
Kim1ey0Horn 15
NWIFOPF-
E. Service Unit Calculation
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
JJ
CQLDNY
cin• m• � �.
The basic service unit for the computation of The Colony's roadway impact fees is the vehicle -mile of travel during
the afternoon peak -hour. To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle -miles
of travel for the service area for the ten-year period,
The growth in vehicle -miles from 2025 to 2035 is based upon projected changes in residential and non-residential
growth for the period. In order to determine this growth, baseline estimates of population, basic square feet, service
square feet, and retail square feet for 2025 were made by the City, along with projections for each of these
demographic statistics through 2035. The Land Use Assumptions for the 2025 Impact Fee Update details the growth
estimates used for the impact fee determination.
The residential and non-residential statistics in the Land Use Assumptions provide the "independent variables" that
are used to calculate the existing (2025) and projected (2035) transportation service units (vehicle -miles) used to
establish the roadway impact fee maximum rates within the service area. The roadway demand service units
(vehicle -miles) for the service area is the sum of the vehicle -miles "generated" by each category of land use in the
service area.
For the purpose of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-
residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected population is converted to dwelling units. The
number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor to compute the vehicle -
miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor computes the average amount of demand
caused by the residential land uses in the service area. The transportation demand factor is discussed in more detail
below.
For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. The Land Use Assumptions provide existing and projected
number of building square footages for three (3) categories of non-residential land uses - basic, service, and retail.
These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American
Industrial Classification System (NAICS).
Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non-residential trips in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11'h Edition. This characteristic is more
appropriate than the number of employees because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation
and is known at the time of application for any development or development modification that would require the
assessment of an impact fee.
The existing and projected Land Use Assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service,
and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle -miles of travel. As noted earlier, a
transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle -
miles of demand for the service area.
The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from three sources - the ITE Trip Generation Manual,
11th Edition, Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by NCTCOG, and trip length information from the
National Household Travel Survey (NHTS)• ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition provides the number of trips
that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding
unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips
are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that particular establishment anyway, such as a trip
between work and home. These trips are called pass -by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the
Kimley>))Horn 16
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
CTHE
OLONY
c�a M• tn,
land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail rate to avoid double counting
trips.
The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length
for each category is based on the region -wide travel characteristics survey conducted by NCTCOG as well as
average vehicle trip lengths collected by NHTS.
The computation of the transportation demand factor is detailed in the following equation:
TDF =T*(1— Pb) *Lm�
where... Lmax = min(L * OD or SAL)
Variables:
TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, L = Average Trip Length (miles), and
T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), OD = Origin -Destination Reduction (50%)
Pb = Pass -By Discount (% of trips), SAL = Max Service Area Trip Length
Lmax = Maximum Trip Length (miles),
The maximum trip length was limited to four (4) miles based on the maximum trip length within the service area.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles; however the service
area within The Colony is approximately four (4) miles in diameter.
The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin -
destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the Roadway Impact Fee is charged to both the origin and
destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within The
Colony to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips as both residential and non-
residential trips, a 50% origin -destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is
assessed to each land use. This methodology is consistent with that used in the NHTS.
Table 5 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land uses and the three (3)
non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor
equation are also shown in the table.
Table 5 — Transportation Demand Factor Calculations
Variable
Residential
ITE 210
Basic
ITE 110
Service
—_:J
ITE 710
Retail
ITE 820
T
0.94
0.65
1.44
3.40
Pb
0%
0%
0%
29%
L
9.79
10.02
10.92
6.43
Lmax
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.22
TDF
3.76
2.60
5.76
7.76
The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10 -Year
Growth Projections in Table 6. This table shows the total vehicle -miles by service area for the years 2025 and 2035.
These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle -Miles of Travel for both 2025 and 2035.
Kimley>»Horn 17
IM11,0'r-
Kimley)))Horn
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
Table 6 —10 -Year Growth Projections
AC,2T
18
Roadway Impact Fee Update THE
The Colony, Texas COLONY
September 2025 �
IV. Roadway Impact Fee Calculation
A. Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for the service area. The maximum
assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible Roadway Impact Fee CIP costs for the service area divided by the
growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10 -year period. A majority of the
components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose
of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided
by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 7 illustrates the computation of
the maximum assessable impact fee computed for the service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify
explanation of the calculation.
Table 7 — Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation
Line Title Description
Total Vehicle -Miles of The total number of vehicle -miles added to the service area based on the
1 Capacity Added by the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Appendix B —
CIP�„ CIP Service Units of Supply)
Each project identified in the Impact Fee CIP will add a certain amount of capacity to the City's roadway network
based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within the service area.
Total Vehicle -Miles of A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities
Existing Demand upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B — CIP Service Units
2 s
of Supply)
A number of facilities identified in the Impact Fee CIP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing
capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing
traffic.
Total Vehicle -Miles of Number of vehicle -miles of travel that are not accommodated by the existing
3 Existing Deficiencies roadway system (from Appendix C — Existing Roadway Facilities
Inventory)
In order to ensure that existing deficiencies on the City's roadway network are not recoverable through impact
fees, this line is based on the entire roadway network within the service area. Any roadway within the service area
that is deficient — even those not identified on the Impact Fee CIP — will have these additional vehicle -miles
removed from the calculation.
F4 Net Amount of Vehicle- A measurement of the amount of vehicle -miles added by the CIP that will
Miles of CapacityAdded not be utilized by existing demand Line 1 — Line 2 — Line 3)
This calculation identifies the portion of the Impact Fee CIP (in vehicle -miles) that may be recoverable through the
collection of impact fees.
Kimley>))Horn 19
WW'Fowr'
I
Total Cost of the CIP
within the Service Area
Roadway Impact Fee Update THE.
The Colony, Texas LOIVY
September 2025
The total cost of the projects within the service area (from Table 4: 10 -Year
Capital Improvement Plan with Conceptual Level Cost Project Cost
Projections)
This line simply identifies the total cost of all of the projects identified in each service area.
6ddCost of Net Capacity The total CIP cost (Line 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity Added
Supplied (Line 4) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1). [(Line 41 Line 1 "(Line 5)]
Using the ratio of vehicle -miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP available to serve future growth to the total
vehicle -miles added, the total cost of the CIP is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding
existing usage and deficiencies).
7 Cost to Meet Existing The difference between the Total Cost of the CIP (Line 5) and the Cost of
Needs and Usage the Net Capacity supplied Line 6). Line 5 — Line 6)
This line is provided for informational purposes only — it is to present the portion of the total cost of the Roadway
Impact Fee CIP that is required to meet existing demand.
Total Vehicle -Miles of Based upon the growth projection provided in the Land Use Assumptions,
d New Demand over Ten an estimate of the number of new vehicle -miles within the service area over
Years the next ten years. from Table 6)
This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle -miles) projected to occur within the service area over the next
ten years.
Percent of Capacity The result of dividing Total Vehicle -Miles of New Demand (Line 8) by the
9 Added Attributable to New Net Amount of Capacity Added (Line 4), limited to 100% (Line 10). This
Growth calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is
10 Chapter 395 Check attributable to new growth.
In order to ensure that the vehicle -miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP do not exceed the amount
needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the
amount of vehicle -miles added by the Roadway Impact Fee CIP exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next
ten years, the Roadway Impact Fee CIP cost is reduced accordingly.
Cost of Capacity Added The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 6) by the
11 Attributable to New Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100%
Growth (Line 9 and 10).
This value is the total Impact Fee CIP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through
impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature.
12 Pre -Credit CIP Cost Per Found by dividing the Cost of the CIP attributed to growth by the Total
Service Unit Vehicle -Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years Line 8). Line 111 Line 8).
This value is the total Impact Fee CIP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact
fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature.
Kimley>>)Horn 20
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
COLONY
B. Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code states:
"(7) A plan for awarding:
(A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service
units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the
payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or
(B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital
improvements plan..."
The City of The Colony has determined the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit shall be 50%
of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. Therefore, the Percent of Fee
Recoverable (Line 13) is multiplied by the Pre -Credit CIP Cost Per Service Unit (Line 12) to obtain the
Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit (Line 14).
Table 8 summarizes these calculations previously mentioned and provides the maximum assessable impact
fee,
Kimley>Morn 21
WvF0PP,-
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
Table 8 — Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee
■� COLONY
rh•n,•-�
Kimley>>>Horn 22
SH 121 CORRIDOR
TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITYADDED BYTHE CIP
18,527
1
(FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B)
2
TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND
7,048
(FROM CIP UNITS OF SUPPLY, APPENDIX B)
TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES
1,780
3
(FROM EXISTING FACILITIES INVENTORY, APPENDIX C)
NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED
9,699
4
(LINE 1 - LINE 2 - LINE 3)
5
TOTAL COST OF THE CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA
$ 39,025,373
(FROM TABLE 4)
6
COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED
$ 20,430,026
(LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5)
7
COST TO MEET EXISTINGNEEDS AND USAGE
$ 18,595,347
(LINE 5 - LINE 6)
TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS
9,624
8
(FROM TABLE6 AND LAND USEASSUMPTIONS)
PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH
99.2%
9
(LINE 8 / LINE 4)
10
IF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%,
99.2%
OTHERWISE NO CHANGE
11
COST OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH
$ 20,266,586
(LINE 6 * LINE 10)
PRE -CREDIT CIP COST PER SERVICE UNIT
12
($ PER VEH-M 1)
$ 2,105
(LINE 11 / LINE 8)
13
PERCENT OF FEE RECOVERABLE
50%
(FROM CHAPTER 395 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE)
MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI)
$ 1,052
14
(LINE 12 * LINE 13)
Kimley>>>Horn 22
C. Service Unit Demand Per Unit Development
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
The Roadway Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected
for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City utilizes the Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table
(LUVMET), presented in Table 9. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of The
Colony. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development's magnitude with respect to
transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of uses are found
in this table. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip -making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy.
The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, and industrial.
The trip rates presented for each land use are a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the
average number of trips generated during the afternoon peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next
column, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass -by
trips, as previously discussed.
The source of the trip generation and pass -by statistics is ITE's Trip Generation Manual, 111h Edition, the latest
edition of the definitive source for trip generation data. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of
land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for
traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning.
To convert vehicle trips to vehicle -miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The adjusted trip length values
are based on the Regional Origin -Destination Travel Survey performed by the North Central Texas Council of
Governments (NCTCOG) as well as average trip lengths from NHTS. The lower of the two trip lengths was utilized
when calculating the transportation demand factor. The other adjustment to trip length is the 50% origin -destination
reduction to avoid double counting of trips. At this stage, another important aspect of the state law is applied — the
limit on transportation service unit demand. If the adjusted trip length is above four (4) miles, the maximum trip
length used for calculation is reduced to four (4) miles. This reduction, as discussed previously, limits the maximum
trip length to the approximate size of the service areas.
The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle -miles per development unit. This number is the product of
the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor,
is used in the impact fee estimate to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The
number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the
impact fee for a development.
Kimley»)Horn 23
Wuppp""""
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
Table 9. Land Use 1 Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET)
COLONY
Cry �.rhr Lak
Land Use Category
ITE Land
Use
Code
Development Unit
Tri
Gen Rate
(PM)
Pass Pass
by by
Rate Source
Tri p
Rate
Trip
Length
(mi)
Adj.
For
O -D
Max
TSP Trip Per Do
Length Length Unit
(mi) (mi)
(PORT AND TERMINAL
Intermodal Truck Terminal
030
1,000 SF GFA
1 87
1.87
10.02
50%
5 01
4 00
7.48
(INDUSTRIAL
General Light Industrial
110
1,000 SF GFA
0 65
0.55
10.02
50°l0
501
400
2.60
Industrial Park
130
1,000 SF GFA
0 34
0.34
10.02
50 %
5 01
4 00
1.36
Warehousing
15U
1, SF GFA
0.16
0.18
10.02
50%
5 01
4 00
.72
Mini -Warehouse
151
1,1700 SF GFA
0.15
0.15
10.02
50%
5.01
400
O.el)
RESIDENTIAL
Single -Family Detached Housing
Mufti -family Housing (Low -Rise) / Townhomes
Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise)
210
220
221
Dwelling 11n,
Dwelring Unit
DwelfngUnit
094
0.51
D.39
0.94
0.51
0.39
9.79
1 9.79
1 979
50 %
50%
50%
4.90
4.90
4.90
4 00
400
4170
3.76
2.04
.56
Multi -family Housing (High -Rise)
Mobile Home Park / Manufactured Housing
222
240
Dwelfing Unit
Dwelling Unit
0.32
0.58
0.32
0.58
9.79
9.79
50%
50%
4.90
4.90
4 00
4 00
1.26
32
Senior Adult Housing -Detached
251
Dwelling Unrt
0.30
0.30
9.79
50%
4.90
400
1.20
Senior Adult Housing -Attached
252
Dwelling Unlit
0.25
0.25
979
50%
4.90 1
4.00
1.00
Assisted Living
254
Beds
024
0.24
979
50%
4.90
4.00
0.95
LODGING
Hotel
310
Room
059
0.59
643
50%
322
3.22
1.
Motel / Other Lodging Facilities
320
Room
0 36
0-36
6.43
50%
322
3.22
1.18
RECREATIONAL
Golf Course
43U
Acre
028
0.28
6-43
50%
3.22
3.22
0.90
Miniature Golf Course
431
Hole
0.33
0.33
6.43
501
3.22
3.22
101$
Golf Driving Range
4 e
Tee
1.2
1.25
6.43
50 %
3.22
3.22
9.02
Molle Theater
445
Screens
13.96
1396
(143
50%
3.22
3.22
44.68
Ice Skating Rink
Racquet / Tennis Club
Recreational Community Center
465
451
495
1,000 SF GFA
Court
1,000 SF GFA
1 33
3.82
2.50
1.33
3. 82
2.50
6.43
6.43
1 6.43
50%
50 %
501/.
3.22
3.22
3_1227
3.22
3.22
3.22
4.28
12.28
8.04
INSTITUTIONAL
Primary/Middle School (1-8)
522
Students
015
0.15
420
50%
2.1U
2.10K3.25
High School
Junior/ Community College
530
540
Students
Students
026
0.11
0.26
0.11
4.20
420
50%
50%
2.10
2.1U
2.10
210
University / College
550
Students
0.15
0.15
4.20
50%
21U
2.10
Church
560
1,000 GFA
.4
.49M55
50%
210
2.1U
Day Care Center
565
1,000 F GFA
11 12
44% C
6.2350%
2.10
2.10
(MEDICAL
Hospital
Nursing Home
610
620
1,000 F GFA
Beds
0.86
0.14
0.8650%
0.1450%
3.78
378
3.78
378
0.53
Clinic
630
1,000 SF GFA
3.69
36950%
378
3.78
13.93
Animal HospitalNeten nary linic
641)
1,000 SF GFA
3.53
30°/o B
2475U%
3.75
378
1 9.32
y Y
A: ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (Septerber 2017)
B: atrrated by Krney-Horn based on TE rates for smilar categories
C. 2021 Pass -by tables for rrETrip Gen Appendices
KimlepMorn 24
Roadway Impact Fee Update THE
The Colony, Texas COLONEY
September 2025
Table 9 Cont'd. Land Use 1 Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET)
Land Use Category
;IT La rid
Use
Code
Development Unit
Trip
Gen
Rate
(P M)
Pass Pass
by by
Rate :Source
Tnp
Rate
Trip
Length
(mi)
Adj.
For
O -D
Adj
Trip
Length
(n">
Max Veh-Mi
Trip
Length Per Dev
(mi) Unit
OFFICE
General Oftice Building
710
1,000 SF GFA
1.44
1,44
1092
50%
546
4 00
576
Corporate Headquarters Building
714
1,000 SF GFA
1.30
1.30
10.92
50%
545
400
5.20
Single Tenant Office Building
Medical -Dental Office Building
715
120
1,000 SF GFA
1,000 SF GrA
176
393
1.76
3.9
10.92
50%
50°10
5 46
546
400
4 00
7.04
Office Park
750
1,000 SF GFA
130
1.30
10.9
50%
546
400
5.20
COMMERCIAL
Automobile Related
New Car Sales
840
1,000SFGFA
2.42
207
B
1.94
560
50%
2.80
2.80
5.42
Automobile Parts Sales
843
1,000 S GFA
490
43%
2 9
560
50°/
2 80
2.80
7.82
Tire Store
848
1,000 SF GFA
3.75
01.
C
2.81 1
560
509/o
280
2.80
7.88
Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop
941
Servicing Positions
4.85
40%
B
2.91 1
560
50%
2 8D
2.80
8.15
Automobile Care Center
942
1,000 SF GFA
3.11
40%
B
1.87 1
560
50%
2.80 1
280
5.22
Gasoline/Service Station
944
Vehicle Fueling Position
13.91
57°i
C
5.98
1 20
50%
0.80
0.60
3.59
Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market
945
Vehicle Fueling Position
18.42
%
8.10
120
50%
am
060
4.86
Self-Seryce Car Wash
947
Stall
5.54
40%
B
3.32
120
50%
0.60
0.60
1.99
Dining
Fine Dining Restaurant
931
1,000 SF GFA
7. B0
44 %
C
4.37
4 79
50 %
2.4D
240
10.46
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
932
1,000 SF GFA
9.05
43%
C
5.16
479
50%
2.40
240
12.35
Fast Food Restaurant without Dnve-Thru Window
933
1.060 SF GFA
33.21
55%
B
14.94
479
50%
2.40
2.40
35.79
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thw Window
934
1,D00 SF GFA
33.03
55°i
C
14.86
479
50%
2.40
240
35.60
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window
937
1,000 F GFA
3899
70%
B
1170
479
0%
2.40
.4
28.01
Other Retail
Free -Standing Discount Store
815
1,000 SF GFA
486
20%
C
3 B9
6 43
50 %
3 22
3.22
12.50
Nursery (Garden Center)
817
1,000 SF GFA
694
30 %
B
4.86
6 43
50%
3 22
3.22
15.82
Shopping eater lo- 150k)
Shopping Plaza (413-150k)
820
821
1,000 SF GFA
1,000 SV GFA
3.40
5.19
29%
40% 1
C
C
2,41
3.11
643
643
50%
50%
322
322
3.22
322
7.75
10.01
Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)
e22
1,000 SF GFA
6.59
40%MC
3.95
543
50°/0
322
322
1271
Supermarket
850
1,000 SF GFA
8 95
24%6.80
543
50%
3.22
322
21.137
Home Improvement Superstore
862
1,000 SF GFA
2 29
42°1.1.33
643
50°/0
322
322
4.27
Toy/Children's Superstore
864
1,000 SF GFA
5 00
30%3.50
6.43
50%
322
3.22
11,25
Department Store
875
1,Otl0 F GFA
1 95
30°11.37
6.43
50°1.
322
372
4.39
Pharmacy/Drugstore w/O Drive-Thru Window
880
1,000 F GFA
651
5314.00
6.43
50%
322
322
12.88
Pharnacy/Drugstore w/Lints-nru Window
BB1
1,000 FGFA
1025
49%5.23
643
50%
322
322
6.1
SERVICES
Walk -In Bank
911
1,000 SF GFA
12 13
40%
B
7.28
339
50%
170
1.70
12.34
Drive-in Bank
912
Drive-in Lanes
27 0
35%
17 6t7
339
SD i.
1.70
1.70
29.82
Hair Salon
91B
1,000 SF GFA
1.45
30%
B
1,02
3 39
50 %
1.70
1.70
1. rZ
A: rrE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition (Septerber 2017)
B: Esbm ied by K.dey-Horn based an rrE rates for simlar categories
Q 2021 Pass -by tables for rrETrip Gen Appendi-
Kimley>»Horn 25
V. Sample Calculations
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
1► COL
City 6y d.-
The
LL
The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee calculations.
Example 1—
Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single -Family Housing
Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps - Example 1
Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit
Step From Table 9 [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table]
1 Development Type:1 Dwelling Unit of Single -Family Detached Housing
Number of Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit
Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3,76
Step
2
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
From Table 8, Line 14 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit]
Service Area: $1,052
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee
Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit
3 Impact Fee = 1 * 3.76 * $1,052
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $3,956
Example 2 —
Development Type —125,000 square foot Home Improvement Superstore
Roadway Impact Fee Calculation Steps - Example 2
Determine Development Unit and Vehicle -Miles Per Development Unit
Step From Table 9 [Land Use - Vehicle -mile Equivalency Table]
1 Development Type: 125,000 square feet of Home Improvement Superstore
Development Unit: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area
Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 4.27
Step Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit
2 From Table 8, Line 14 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit]
Service Area: $1,052
Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee
Step Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit
3 Impact Fee =125 * 4.27 * $1,052
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $561,505
Kimley>»Horn 26
A. Conclusion
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
COLONY
The City of The Colony has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of roadway impact
fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code.
This report establishes the maximum allowable roadway impact fee that could be assessed by the City of The Colony
within the SH 121 Corridor Service Area. The maximum assessable roadway impact fee calculated in this report is
$1,052 per vehicle -mile.
This document serves as a guide to the assessment of roadway impact fees pertaining to future development and the
City's need for roadway improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City
Council may establish an amount to be assessed (if any) up to the maximum established within this report and
update the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly.
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this update are appropriate and consistent with
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed
Capital Improvement Plan are appropriately incorporated into the process.
KimleyoHorn 27
APPENDICES
A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
B. CIP Service Units of Supply
C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory
Kimley>>)Horn
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
JC( THE
28
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
A. Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
Kimley>»Horn
JJ,C,THE,,
City 11 the Lake
The Colony - 2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Capital Improvement Plan for Roadway Impact Fees
Summary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
M A...... t.......,, ..,....-...rte _ C41 494 f n AAn Q.—ira Aran
#
Class
Pro'e
Limits
Status
Project Cost
1
4U -B (1/2)
S Colony Blvd- (1)
Lakeshore Blvd to Westport Dr
Widening
$
655,000
2
6D (1/3)
S Colony Blvd (2)
Main St, to Paige Rd-
Median
$
3,760,000
3
4D -C
S Colony Blvd (3)
Paige Rd to Bear Run Rd
Completed
$
393,553
4
6D (1/3)
S. Colony Blvd (4)
Paige Rd to Memorial Dr
Median
$
2,030,000
5
4D -C
S Colony Blvd. Overpass
350' N of SH 121 SBFR to Grandscape Blvd
Completed
$
5,132,914
6
4D -C
Memorial Dr. (1)
Standridge Dr. to 570' W. of Main St
Completed
$
1,730,726
7
4D -C
Memorial Dr. (2)
570'W. of Main St. to Main St
Completed
$
370,009
8
6D (1/3)
Memorial Dr. (3)
Main St, to City Limits
Median
$
9,335,000
9
4D -C (1/2)
Memorial Dr. (4)
Blair Oaks Dr. to Paige Rd-
Completed
$
136,971
10
4U -A (1/2)
Standridge Dr. (1)
510' N of Memorial Dr- to 245' S of Cedar Ridge Ct
Widening
$
1,426,000
11
6D (1/3)
Standridge Dr. (2)
Memorial Dr. to 510'N of Memorial Dr
Median
$
373,000
(1/4)
Main St
Cougar Al to S Colony Blvd
Median
$
352,600
6D -B & 8D -A
Pai a Rd.
SH 121 to S. Colony Blvd
Completed
$
3,560,302
4U -A (1/2)
Morningstar DrCrestwood
Ln. to N. Colony Blvd
Widening
$
1,991,000
d128D
4U -A
Blair Oaks Dr
SH 121 to Memorial Dr
Widening
$
2,020,000
4D -C (1/2)
Memorial Dr. (5)
Paige Rd to 840' E. of Paige Rd
Completed
$
121,706
6D (1/3)
Memorial Dr. (6)
Standridge Dr, to 570'W. of Main St
Median
$
2,514,000
4D -C
Memorial Dr. (7)
Wodey Drto S Colony Blvd
Completed
$
870,893
Intersection Improvements
1-1
-
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes (1)
Paige Rd. - SB
New
$
275,1700
1-2
-
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes (1)
Morning Star. - SB
New
$
275,000
!-3
-
SH 121 Deceleration Lanes (1)
Blair Oaks Dr. - SB
New
$
275,000
14
-
Paige Rd./Nash Dr & Paige Rd/Norris
Nash Drive to Norris
New
$
600,000
1-5
-
Standridge Dr & Memorial Dr
(Standridge Dr- / Memorial Dr Signal
Completed
$
379,545
1.6
-
S Colony Blvd / Floor & Decor
:S Colony Blvd / Floor & Decor Signal
Future
$
401,664
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future
Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony,
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design Manual, or the
determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update
Appends A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
City of The Colony, Texas
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information: Description: Project No. 1
Name: S. Colony Blvd. (1) This project consists of the construction
Limits: Lakeshore Blvd to Westport Dr of the southern two lanes of an ultimate
Impact Fee Class: 4U -B (1/2) four -lane undivided section.
Ultimate Class: Minor Collector
Length (If): 770
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
-
INo.
Item Description
1 Quantity Unit Unit Price
$ 104,000
Item Cost
110
Unclassified Street Excavation
1,027 1 c $ 32.00
$
32,864
210
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
1,968 s $ 36.00
$
70,848
:310
7" Concrete Pavement
1,925 s $ 74.00
$
142,450
.410
4" Topsoil
685 s $ 12.00
$
8,220
501
Concrete Driveway Approach
1 ea $ 4,000.00
$
4,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
258,382
. r _II3t Allowances"._
Item Description
. .
I Notes Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
10,335
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
38,757
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
7,751
Roadway Drainage
Standard Internal System 35%
$
90,434
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated $0
$
-
Water
Minor Adjustments 2%
$
5,168
,I
Sewer
Minor Adjustments 5%
$
12,919
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
12,919
Illumination
Standard Ilumination System 6%
S
15,503
Other:
1 $0
$
-
-Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:
$
193,786
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
452,168
Construction Contingency: 15°Io
$
67,825
Construction Cost TOTAL:I
$
520,000
Impact
Item Description Notes:
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 520,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 104,000
Mobilization
6%
$ 31,200
ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included
0%
$ -
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL
$ 655,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Description:Project Information:
Name: S. Colony Blvd. (2) This project consists of the construction of the
Limits: Main St. to Paige Rd. additional two lanes to complete the six lane
Impact Fee Class: 6D (1/3) divided minor arterial.
Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial
Length (If): 5,205
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Allowance
I Item Cost
Construction:
-
No.
Item Description
Quantity
I Unit Unit Price
Mobilization
Item Cost
109
Unclassified Street Excavation
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
7,519
c $ 32.00
$
240,608
209
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
$ 3,760,000
14,458
s $ 36.00
$
520,500
309
8" Concrete Pavement
14,458
s $ 80.00
$
1,156,667
409
4" Topsoil
8,675
s $ 12.00
$
104,100
1501
Concrete Driveway Approach
5
ea $ 4,000.00
$
20,820
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
2,042,695
T IT,
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
81,708
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
306,404
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
61,281
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
,I
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
102,135
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
Other:
$0
$
`"Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
551,528
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
2,594,223
Construction Contingency: 15'I
$
389,133
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
2,984,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes:
Allowance
I Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 2,984,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 596,800
Mobilization
6%
$ 179,040
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No ROW Acquisition Costs included
0%
$ -
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 3,760,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of
the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Information.
1 Item Cost
Description:Project
Name:
S. Colony Blvd. (3)
This project consisted of the reconstruction of an
Limits:
Paige Rd. to Bear Run Rd.
existing asphalt section to a four -lane divided
Impact Fee Class:
4D -C
arterial. The City's actual cost for this project was
Ultimate Class:
Minor Arterial
$393,553.
Length (If):
855
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
ProjectImpact Fee •
Item Description Notes: Allowance
1 Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost: -
$ 393,553
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 393,553
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information: Description: Project No. 4
Name: S. Colony Blvd. (4) This project consists of the construction of the
Limits: Paige Rd. to Memorial Dr additional two lanes to copmlete the six -lane
Impact Fee Class: 6D (1/3) divided minor arterial.
Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial
Length (If): 2,810
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,611,000
INo. 1
Item Description
$ 322,200
Quantity Unit Price
6%
Item Cost
109
Unclassified Street Excavation
$
4,059$ 32.00
$
129,888
209
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
7,806$ 36.00
Mea
$
281,000
309
8" Concrete Pavement
7,806$ 80.00
$
624,444
409
4" Topsoil
4,683$ 12.00
$
56,200
501
Concrete DrivewayApproach
3$ 4,000.00
$
11,240
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
1,102,772
a
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
v
Prep ROW
4%
$
44,111
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control
15%
$
165,416
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
33,083
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
55,139
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
$
Other:
$0
$
"Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
297,749
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,400,521
Construction Contingency: 5°Ic
$
210,078
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,611,000
Impact Fee Project Cost Summary
Item Description Notes:
Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,611,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 322,200
Mobilization
6%
$ 96,660
ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included
0%
$
impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 2,030,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of
the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc
updated: 9/18/2025
Description:Project Information:
Name: S. Colony Blvd. Overpass This project consists of the construction of an
Limits: 350' N of SH 121 SBFR to Grandscape Blvd overpass connecting South Colony Blvd. with
Impact Fee Class: 4D -C Grandscape Blvd. / Nebraska Furniture Mart Dr. The
Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial $5,132,914 is the City's cost towards this
Length (if): 1,700 improvement.
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
ProjectImpact Fee •
Item Description Notes: Allowance I
Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost: -
$ 5,132,914
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 5,132,914
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future
Capital Improvement Planning within the the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the
City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/1812025
Impact. -Cost
Item Description
Notes:
Allowance I
Name:
Memorial Dr. (1)
This project consisted of the construction of four
Limits:
Standridge Dr. to 570'W. of Main St.
lanes of an ultimate six -lane divided facility. The
Impact Fee Class:
4D -C
City's contribution to this project was $1,730,726.
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
Length (If):
3,475
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
Impact. -Cost
Item Description
Notes:
Allowance I
Cost
.Actual Construction Cost:
-
$ 1,730,726
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 1,730,726
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
',Project Information:
I Allowance
Description: Project No. 7
Name:
Memorial Dr. (2)
This project consisted of the construction of four
Limits:
570' W. of Main St. to Main St.
lanes of an ultimate six -lane divided facility. The
Impact Fee Class:
4D -C
City's contribution to this project was $370,009.
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
Length (If):
570
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Impact•
Item Description Notes:
I Allowance
Item Cost
.Actual Construction Cost:
$ 370,009
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 370,009
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Information:
Construction Cost Projection
Description:
ProjectProject
Name:
Memorial Dr. (3)
This project consists of the construction of the
Limits:
Main St. to City Limits
additional two lanes to complete the six -lane
Impact Fee Class:
6D (1/3)
divided major arterial.
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
$ -
Length (If):
12,925
597,440
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
1 Item Cost
Construction:
-
I
INo.
Item Descri tion
$ 1,481,800
I Quantity i Unit 1 Unit Price
6%
Item Cost
109
Unclassified Street Excavation
$ -
18,670 c $ 32.00
$
597,440
209
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
35,903 s $ 36.00
$
1,292,508
:309
8" Concrete Pavement
35,903 s $ 80.00
$
2,872,240
,409
4" Topsoil
21,542 s $ 12.00
$
258,504
;501
lConcrete Driveway Approach
13 ea $ 4,000.00
$
52,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
5,072,692
olm.
N..::..._.
Item Description
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
202,908
J
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control
15%
$
760,904
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
152,181
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
253,635
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
$
Other:
1
$0
$
—Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,369,628
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
6,442,320
Construction Contingency: 15°Ia
$
966,348
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
7,409,000
Impact
Item Description Notes:
Allowance
1 Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 7,409,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 1,481,800
Mobilization
6%
$ 444,540
ROW/Easement Acquisition: No ROW Acquisition Costs included
0%
$ -
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
1 $ 9,335,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Description:Project Information:
Name: Memorial Dr. (4) This project consisted of the construction of two
Limits: Blair Oaks Dr. to Paige Rd. lanes of an ultimate six -lane divided facility. The
Impact Fee Class: 4D -C (1/2) City's previous actual contribution for the existing
Ultimate Class: Minor Arterial four -lane facility was $136,971
Length (If): 3,320
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
1 Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost:
$ 136,971
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 136,971
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kim/ey-Hom and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information: Description: Project No. 10
Name: Standridge Dr. (1) This project consists of the widening of
Limits: 510'N of Memorial Dr. to 245'S of Cedar Ridge Ct. an existing two-lane facility to a four -
Impact Fee Class: 4U -A (1/2) lane undivided major collector.
Ultimate Class: Major Collector
Length (If): 1,245
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
1
Item Cost
Construction:
No.
Item Descri tion
I Quantity I Unit Unit Price
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
Item Cost
111
Unclassified Street Excavation
2,214 c $ 32.00
$
70,848
:211
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
4,289 s $ 36.00
$
154,404
'311
7" Concrete Pavement
4,220 s $ 74.00
$
312,280
411
4" Topsoil
1,384 s $ 12.00
$
16,608
501
1 Concrete Driveway Approach
2 ea $ 4,000.00
:6
8,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
562,140
�t•°:. ,
Item Description
Notes Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
22,486
J
Traffic Control
Constructlon Phase Traffic Control
15%
$
84,321
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
16,864
4
Roadway Drainage
Standard Internal System
35%
$
196,749
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
4
Water
Minor Adjustments
2%
$
11,243
J
Sewer
Minor Adjustments
5%
$
28,107
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
28,107
4
Illumination
Standard Ilumination System
6%
$
33,728
Other
`;o
$
"Allowances based on % of Paving Constructlon Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal.,
$
421,605
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
a
983,745
Construction Contingency: 15°Io
$
147,562
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,132,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
1
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$
1,132,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$
226,400
Mobilization
6%
$
67,920
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0%
$
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$
1,426,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any
future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information:
Description: Project No.
Name:
Standridge Dr. (2) This project consists of the construction of the
Limits:
Memorial Dr. to 510' N of Memorial Dr. median lanes to complete the six -lane divided
Impact Fee Class:
6D (1/3) arterial.
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
Length (If):
510
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Roadway•
•n Cost Projection
INo.
Item Descri tion
Quantity Unit I Unit Price I
Item Cost
109
Unclassified Street Excavation
$ 32.00
737Kea
$
23,584
209
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
1,417$ 36.00
$
51,012
:309
8" Concrete Pavement
1,417$ 80.00
$
113,360
•409
4" Topsoil
850$ 12.00
$
10,200
501
Concrete DrivewayApproach
1$ 4,000.00
$
4,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
202,156
._
Item Description
Notes
..
Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
8,086
J
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
30,323
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
6,065
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
10,108
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
$
Other:
$0
$
—Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
54,582
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
256,738
Construction Contingency: 151 I%
$
38,511
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
296,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information: Description: Project No. . 12
Name: Main St. This project consists of the construction of the
Limits: Cougar Aly to S Colony Blvd. median lanes to complete the eight -lane divided
Impact Fee Class: 8D (1/4) arterial.
Ultimate Class: Major Arterial
Length (if): 2,440
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,399,000
No.
Item Description
$ 279,800
Quantity 1 Unit 1 Unit Price
6%
Item Cost
112
Unclassified Street Excavation
$
3,525 c $ 32.00
$
112,800
212
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
6,778 s $ 36.00
$
244,000
312
8" Concrete Pavement
6,778 s $ 80.00
$
542,222
'412
4" Topsoil
4,067 s $ 12.00
$
48,800
501
Concrete Driveway Approach
2 ea $ 4,000.00
$
9,760.
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
957,582
r.Component
r
Item Description
Notes
IAllowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
38,303
J
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
143,637
•I
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
28,727
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
•I
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
47.879
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
$
Other:
$0
$
"Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
258,546
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,216,128
Construction Contingency: 1 15 u/"
$
182,419
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,399,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,399,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 279,800
Mobilization
6%
$ 83,940
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No Row Acquisition Costs included 0%
$
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)
$ 352,600
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of
the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Information:
Description:Project
Name:
Paige Rd.
This project consisted of the construction of a six -
Limits:
SH 121 to S. Colony Blvd
lane divided arterial north of Memorial Dr and an
Impact Fee Class:
6D -B & 8D -A
eight -lane arterial south of Memorial Dr. The City's
Ultimate Class:
Minor/Major Arterial
total cost for this project was $3,560,302.
Length (if):
4,405
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas
Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kirnley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information: Descriptiow Project No. 14
Name: Morningstar Dr. This project consists of the widening of
Limits: Crestwood Ln. to N. Colony Blvd. an existing two-lane facility to a four -
Impact Fee Class: 4U -A (1/2) lane undivided collector.
Ultimate Class: Major Collector
Length (If): 1,745
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
No.
Item Description
1 Quantity Unit I nit Price
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
Item Cost
111
Unclassified Street Excavation
3,103 c $ 32.00
$
99,296
211
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
6 011 s $ 36.00
$
216,396
311
7" Concrete Pavement
5,914 s $ 74.00
$
437,636
411
4" Topsoil
1,939 s $ 12.00
$
23,268
501
Concrete Driveway Approach
2 ea $ 4,000.001$
8,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
784,596
..
Item Descri tion y
Notes Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
31,3$4
J
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control
15%
$
117,689
4
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
23,538
J
Roadway Drainage
Standard Internal System
35%
$
274,609
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
J
Water
Minor Adjustments
2%
$
15,692
J
Sewer
Minor Adjustments
5%
$
39,230
4
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
39,230
J
Illumination
Standard Ilumination System
6%
$
47,076
Other:
$0
$
-
"mowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:
$
588,448
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,373,044
Construction Contingency: 1 15%
$
205,957
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,580,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$
1,580,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$
316,000
Mobilization
6%
$
94,800
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0%
$
-
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$
1,991,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project.
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Description:Project Information:
Name: Blair Oaks Dr. This project consists of the widening of
Limits: SH 121 to Memorial Dr. an existing facility to a four -lane
Impact Fee Class: 4U -A undivided collector.
Ultimate Class: Major Collector
Length (If): 890
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
No.
Item Description
Quantity t Unit Price
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
—
Item Cost
103
Unclassified Street Excavation
$ 32.00
$
101,280
203
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
$ 36.00
$
220,752
303
7" Concrete Pavement
$ 74.00
$
446,442
403
4" To soil
$ 12.00
$
23,736
501
Concrete Drivewa Approach
$ 4,000.00
$
4,000
Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:
$
796,210
Item Description
Notes Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
31,848
J
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
119,432
J
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
23,886
J
Roadway Drainage
Standard Internal System 35%
$
278,674
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated $0
$
-
J
Water
Minor Adjustments 2%
$
15,924
J
Sewer
Minor Adjustments 5%
$
39,811
J
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
39,811
J
Illumination
Standard Ilumination System 6%
$
47,773
Other:
1 1 $0
$
-
" Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:
$
597,159
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,393,369
Construction Contingency: 15°I°
$
209,005
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,603,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$
1,603,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$
320,600
Mobilization
6%
$
96,180
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0%
$
-
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$
2,020,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project Information:
Item Cost
Description: Project No. 16
Name:
Memorial Dr. (5)
This project consisted of the construction of two
Limits:
Paige Rd. to 840' E. of Paige Rd.
northern lanes of an ultimate six -lane divided facility
Impact Fee Class:
4D -C (1/2)
adjacent to the Home Depot. The City's previous
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
actual contribution for the existing four -lane facility
Length (if):
840
was $121,706.
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Impact•Cost Summary
Item Description Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost:
$ 121,706
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
1 $ 121,706
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Description:Project Information:
Name: Memorial Dr. (6) This project consists of the construction of the
Limits: Standridge Dr. to 570'W. of Main St. median lanes to complete the six -lane divided
Impact Fee Class: 6D (1/3) arterial.
Ultimate Class: Major Arterial
Length (If): 3,475
Service Area(s): SH 121 Corridor
Roadway
Construction Cost Projection
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,995,000
No. I
Item Description
$ 399,000
I Quantity I Unit I Unit Price
6%
Item Cost
109
Unclassified Street Excavation
$ -
5,020 c $ 32.00
$
160,640
209
8" Grade A, Type 1 or 2 Flex Base
9,653 s $ 36.00
$
347,508
309
8" Concrete Pavement
9 653 s $ 80.00
$
772,240
.409
4" Topsoil
5,792 s $ 12.00
$
69,504
501
Concrete DrivewayApproach
4 ea $ 4,000.00
$
16,000
Paving Construction Coist Subtotal:
$
1,365,892
Item Description .
Notes
Allowance
Item Cost
Prep ROW
4%
$
54,636
Traffic Control
Construction Phase Traffic Control 15%
$
204,884
Pavement Markings/Markers
3%
$
40,977
Roadway Drainage
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Special Drainage Structures
None Anticipated
$0
$
-
Water
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Sewer
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Landscaping and Irrigation
5%
$
68,295
Illumination
None Anticipated
0%
$
-
Other:
$0
$
"Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal
Allowance Subtotal:
$
368,792
Paving and Allowance Subtotal:
$
1,734,684
Construction Contingency:
$
260,203
Construction Cost TOTAL:
$
1,995,000
Impact
Item Description
Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Construction:
-
$ 1,995,000
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
20%
$ 399,000
Mobilization
6%
$ 119,700
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0%
$ -
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 2,514,000
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony.
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
The Colony
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
updated: 9/18/2025
Project
Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost:
Name:
Memorial Dr. (7)
This project consisted of the construction of four
Limits:
Worley Dr to S. Colony Blvd
lanes of an ultimate six -lane divided facility of
Impact Fee Class:
4D -C
Memorial Dr. The City's previous actual roadway
Ultimate Class:
Major Arterial
contribution for the existing four -lane facility was
Length (If):
1,580
$870,893.
Service Area(s):
SH 121 Corridor
Impact Fee Project Cost Summary
Item Description I Notes: Allowance
Item Cost
Actual Construction Cost:
$ 870,893
Construction Cost Estimate From City
Engineering/Survey/Testing:
ROW/Easement Acquisition:
Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:
$ 870,893
NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for
any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of The Colony
The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance, Engineering Design
Manual, or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
City of The Colony, Texas Appendix A -Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
B. CIP Service Units of Supply
Kimley>Morn
■j COLS
City by the LW -
The Colony - 2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
CIP Service Units of Supply
TOTAL COST IN SH 121 CORRIDOR SERVICE AREA f 39,025,373
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Appendix B -CIP Supply
Units of Supp
City of The Colony, Texas
Ww"""OF-
Roadway Impact Fee Update
The Colony, Texas
September 2025
C. Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory
Kimleyl Horn
Jj,C,2THE,
The Colony - 2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory
7/1-25
2025 Roadv y Impact Fes Update dix C - Existlng FacilN—W
es I
City of The Colony Texas Appan
2025 Roadway Impact Fee Update
Appendix C - ExisEng FacAibes Inventory
cm of The coieny, Texas
Paige Rd
iiquP�n Cr
Arb.1b;- Rd
575 _
-
R71
.._.__-
] 7
-.. .,.._..
IIYB _
-.. -....
Yu
w
7i6Q
...t....
/N _
...._..
IgG%
.�_
70G_
....._.
_700
_ 2iP _
_.
_ 170
._17
$
7e
,76
pi Rd
G1619n [tf
_ ..—_ ...
lq pr
..
12i.
ODS
] ]
608
Ysa
1457
N7
100%
700
700
189
1�
1,7
39
57
,73
pi Rd
w
Ai:!A l Of
$97
071
3 7
008
Yea
1457 1
M
100%
700
700
711
231
167
i7
as 1
,7/
AitraAle aar41w9'Wna
i7[
.vas
...WP-
a-.. ]
'!GO
Yea
7 ,I
690
1wt
iomi
,700
700
837
n6
B97
59B
z9r
931_
,06
230
___
- 503
r�6
bar's
-
c74
- --
s �
- - -
as B
---
vee
�6i'
5501
e9a
W6
700
?oa_
-700
-
- 4,6
N9
_
57'15
_s,a
5T$' -763.••
PWw
prBali.Or
Ba vin WaY
MNnNn F+I,laha9 ila11 E11
11ya,7M
,,1116
450
021
008
1 3
1 ,
6O8
7H{
Yes
Y4a
+00
174
100%
loos
700
425
477
1 38
39
9
16
30
2S
G
§tinydpa DY
__ RQge Gr
BES'_
1
0.,S
1. ?^
-WZ .
Yw
100-.
174 ...
100%
A75 ,
423
...._..
SS_
76
-__
13
79
47
_.. _.. __.__
3S ., �.
p'._
-_— _ _
�!-_
!
�aca]i!r!.
iss
006
, S
2u -c
YrY
,fA
....
171
100%
AZ5
._4611 -
.947
5�5
351
_-!
ULAN BEM
--.._n_
YYB 8£i 121
VAkrMIal DY
3,6W
0.7]
7 2
4"
Yaa
181
716
100%
630
STS
,p,
8>ra4[rr lCiNw D1
Main S[
1.715
019
3 ]
60.8
Na
]M
436
100%
700
700
405
409
71
39
337
MO
us, and
g
Cle ar VN4l or
SYroa>e Dr
2.$90
0.49
3- 7
6a8
No
Jm
760
100%
_?00
700
I 30
7p30
189
275
57
aha
l58
Eee6, L'4W91 Blrtl
Blair Oaks Or
_-Ayad4lp --
Rd
�•t al6
0,5_
0.35
5 S_•
3 9
!0-0
{D8
No
Nn
SB6_
!73
•430
6'i%S
100%
1Wq{
_7m_
71n
.7W_
700
-.78�
�i7
_2FM
742
._
,55
/W0
657
502
gyp, 5�
Mil
Na
Bear Run
Dr
995
097
2. 7
4118
Mo
296
438
la0%
46
476
T1
71
27
3F
44
37
Leud, '•f gr.d
YVida 0."D1
_"p. Li Vw
570.
.. Q42-
Z- 7
_/IJ -a
Ne,
]B6
498.
1yJ1{
iT5
476
23
�!
^
1]7
_ 11 _
76Y
1/
671-.
12
Sm19i Med
:Cobn7
llempial Or
_ _.—. _ _
- Rolling Hill Rd
—
7.0/S
_—
0]9
__.._ _
S 3
_ _ — _
6F?6
--..._.- ..
ft
qe
y57
76B
679 .
10011
700
......._..
700
8,3
_ _.
ii
913
44
17
21
T:
-
73
. .. __..
p jh GW,#j54
p
7511'w d wW 5G
XS
OQS
2 2
4u•6
466
100%
4T5
A77
&.uth w1d
Rd
GnfN. Dr
170
0.31
3 s
Me
No
999
580
100%
71p
701171.
714
1]j
,951
FM
571
a.0
>3rdh1 D.
CJewe.Catle�9r
I,IdO
6,W
] ]
!!14
No
_999.
-580
_1a01L
700
.7W
.00
S(r
e47
191
_716
686
B2,
Mat"
—.
OpefO B1.0
-r.-- -_
Alta Oaks Ln
Branch Hollow Dr
�
7,510
OW
3 - .-]
H
-608
No
168
458
1✓J6%
700
700
818
819
190
200
799
_719 - -
64i5/h 8Nd
Main St
Waalppn Dir
485
a.00
41F.E
1'ab
386
45a
100%
/76
476
84
d<
S7
40
51
M
Eeild+ 81ad
Bear Run Rd
N 1w
1815
021
] a
00.8
7b
35]
870
108%
700
700
843
1138.
906
436
y>y,Nid-qa Sy
7tr%E d lm MC!
255' S of CedarRidge CT
1,2q
0;/
32
FWA
_;,Na
174
1 T4
-.*M_
EC
175 _
425
173
112
'SFS
112
';!
21
..9
71
91
a1
12
6a11i�9W9a Dr
..-...._
- ."p�
C1
i3B It—
Oadr Ralp+CT
_7RG
.04_'+_ .
�__ ._!.
f
l7tt{
V"
Ves
174
174
tT4
174
^jp0}r
-�5
421
...477
?3 •..
23
%6-
9
io
.12-.
1!.
_
fi
JF
Or
Cadaf l
Creek He6w
Cava),
Or
-_-, -..
790
Sib
._.
.05
006
�-..
1
1 1
7%4:
._. .. _..
Ves
- ,174
�...
$74
100%
T—
/75
.. �.
41s
.....
_ 25.
75
t0
10
15
17
. ..
--.—
61Wr�
Steepleridge Dr_-
2M
OW
1_ i
71FC
'T"
— ,74
Sri
100%
425
425
2t_
72
9
9
+]
1S _
- 7u
D,
Steeplen a Or
- _
51 Dr
f90
O.W
1 ,
2[FO
Vw
174
574
100%
_AM---
475
32
S
6
5
7
of
p+H p
GoPlo00 Or
7G
604
1 S
wil;
T-
174
174
1M%
425
425
l6
fE
7.
7
11
11
p%alfWaa De
146
--
_O,W_
-
1 - 1-
_ 711.6
�.
._ ..
Y.6
174
17/
700%
..............
415
. 475
17
12
_ 6
._
,0
5 _
70
7
7
Lk _
GwMdR�1g40'
"""'0i'^
Highedge Dr
•.. 293
006.
-0A -5
, f
i1FG
•2U.0
Yea
.1 T4
f74
1d1%_
475
/Z5
2F..
73
.-
2J
21-
9
.14,__14
ti
_
1i
•6a1M?dya
Di
Or
Shadowed a Dr
0r
Q'
2k6
046
1 T
1 1
$11.0
Yea
Yea
,74
174
174
174
160%
100%
175
/25
47'3
425
25
73
a
9
14
ti
Smnded a Dr
9!p?r!1!-p
11w'11Ja 177
0.06
T 5
7U4
Y+as
_ 174
Sdndnd9e
iD,
_
Ea,aaed Or _
_707
i�5'
0.04
_ 1 1
.• ]LLC
Yii
...171.
_ f74 _
_1 --
.4T5 ,
ri6
JV --
.?0_
_ f6 `
S
36 .
.73
i3 . --
'
..
P
--
6e7a
1j4'fly&navel Cf
f50'-
Gti1
, S
217:
174
174
1d7%
AM
475
17
T2
5
7
standWwOt
Men,eIW Dir
77ME01.Wel"D1
,,425
0t0
3 ]
80.6
Ma
51 aT
490
100%
7W
700
40a'
/06
7w
,6tl
S}S
aw'.4", W
B� 65, 571
WB SH 121_
97S
010
] ]
6016
Yea
+132
490
i0f7%_
700
700
828
329 _
177
77
1 _
5-51-1-
_767
Ste Or
_R
W83H tI1
_
h4mWW P'
7473
Q47
9 3
BO -8
Yee
1134
490
W%
100
704
492
e92
26S
115
217
377
SUBTOTAL
1y1
10.54
101.771
F7,2�5
9
17118
2025 Roadway Impaa Fee Updale
City pf The Colpny, Texas Appendix C - Exis9n8 FaulNas Inventory