HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/14/1999 City Council 0(1718,
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF COUNCIL
HELD ON
JUNE 14, 1999
The WORK SESSION of the City Council of the City off'he Colony, Texas was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
on the 14th day of June 1999 at City Hall, with the following council roll call:
William W. Manning, Mayor Present
John Gordon, Councilmember Present
Lewis Jue, Councilmember Present
David Stanwick, Councilmember Present
A1 Garcia, Councilmember Absent (personal)
John Dillard, Councilmember Present
Jeff Meyers, Councilmember Present
and with six ~resent a quorum was established, the following items were addressed:
ITEM DESCRIPTION SOURCE STATUS
1.1 Discussion of an ordinance amending Section 15 of the Workshop
Subdivision Ordinance by adding an access policy
applicable to FM 423 and SH 121
Mr. Persaud presented some options to the policy, which
had first been addressed by the council on June 7, 1999.
Councilmember Stanwick stated that he would like to see
joint access driveways encouraged whenever possible. The
council discussed various distances for space between
driveways and distance from corners. They also reviewed
standards from surrounding cities.
The council reached a consensus to set the following
distances:
Spacing between driveways 200 feet
Distance from curb - 150 feet
This ordinance will be on the June 21, 1999 agenda for
action.
1.2 Discussion of Tax Increment Financing in the City of The Workshop
Colony
Mr. Lambert stated this meeting is for information only
and not to negotiate terms with the proponents of the TIF.
Mr. Lambert further advised that there had been two
proponents, Austin Ranch (Billingsley Co.) and Wynnewood
(Matthews-Southwest), and that he had received a call from
Tim House representing Matthews-Southwest withdrawing
,.007186
the Wynnewood property from the TIF consideration. He
said formal, written notice of the withdrawal is forthcoming.
Mr. Lambert then introduced visiting participants:
Tom Leonard with Leonard, Frost, Hurt & Lilly, an expert
of TIF's in Texas.
Boyd London with First Southwest, the city's financial
advisor.
Leroy Grawunder with Fischer and Newsom, the city's
bond counsel.
John Hill with Cowles & Thompson, the city attorney.
Mr. Lambert also advised that Susan Mead, attorney for
the Billingsley Co., was present to answer questions, it
necessary.
Mr. Lambert said the council needs to come away from
this meeting with direction to staff regarding a cost benefif
analysis and the appointment of a negotiation committee.
Mr. Tom Leonard then addressed the council. He advised
that he serves as the attorney for economic development for
Denton County and that he did some work for Lucy
Billingsley in March of this year. Mr. Leonard further
advised he did not believe either of those two matters
constitutes a conflict of interest for him with regard to this
issue.
Mr. Leonard continued and gave the council details of Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) districts, covering the statute
governing TIF's and answering questions posed by the
council, staff and other participants. Mr. Leonard stated that
the council does have control over how the TIF board can
spend money.
Mr. Body London said council should look at all the facts,
weigh the risks and then decide if a TIF is advantageous for
the city. He cited other cities in Texas that have successfully
created TIF's and examples of how the funds had been
expended. One example was the City of Grapevine' s TIF for
Grapevine Mills Mall. Mr. London said his firm could find
a contractor to perform the cost benefit analysis.
Mayor Manning asked if these funds could be used to
build a sports complex, a community center, roads, etc. Mr.
London and Mr. Leonard both said those would be acceptable
projects for the funds from a TIF. Mayor Manning asked it
it would benefit the city to create the TIF if other entities.,
LISD and Denton County did not participate. Mr. Leonard
said it would benefit the city even if those entities do nol
participate. Mayor Manningsaid we need to know right away
if LISD and Denton County will participate.
Mr. Lambert noted the following issues need to be
reviewed:
2
· What should be the boundaries of the TIF zone?
· What are the costs associated with legal services and
studies for TIF and who should pay? (even costs
incurred by city)
· What should the TIF pay for?
· How does the TIF handle commercial, industrial, retail,
office park, multi-family and residential zoning. Should
residential and multi-family be excluded?
· How does the TIF handle impact fee monies versus TIF
monies regarding what is used to pay for what?
· Who should be appointed to negotiate these details with
the Austin Ranch representatives?
· If created, who should be appointed to the 4-member
board?
Mr. Leroy Grawunder said the next essential step is to
prepare the Project Plan and the Financial Plan.
Mayor Manning told the council they need to decide if we
should go forward, who would be on the negotiation team and
what the city would accept in the TIF. Mayor Manning
further stated that he would not support a TIF for residential
properties.
Further discussion followed regarding advantages,
disadvantages and uses for the funds.
Councilmember John Gordon said he wants to know about
LISD and Denton County participation before expending any
funds for a Cost Benefit Analysis. He further stated the Cost
Benefit Analysis is not needed if we do not go forward with
the TIF.
Mr. Lambert is to contact LISD and Denton County. All
information will be presented to council at the June 21, 1999
council meeting for further review and possible action.
Mayor Manning suggested that another work session would
be needed regarding this matter.
With no further business to address, Mayor Manning
adjourn.ed the meeting at 8:55 p.m.