HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/20/1997 City Council MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON
February 20, 1997
The Work Session of the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, was called to order
at 6:45 p.m. on the 20th day of February, 1997, at City Hall with the following Council roll
call:
William Manning, Mayor Present
Bill Longo, Councilmember Present
Mary Watts, Councilmember Present
David Stanwick, Councilmember Present
Wilma Avey, Councilmember Present
John Dillard, Councilmember Present
Dave Kovatch, Councilmember Present
and with seven present, a quorum was established and the following items were addressed:
1. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS FOR SOLID
WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF THE COLONY
Mr. Johnny Smith opened the meeting by thanking the current contractors, Texas
Waste Management and CWD for extending their respective contracts with the City so that -
the council and committee had enough time to review the proposals and make the best
decision. This process started in September, with proposals being received November 22,
1996. The proposals are for an automated system. HDR was hired to work with the
committee and staff to review all proposals. All bidders have been kept apprised during the
whole process. Tonight the council will hear presentations from Mike Carleton with HDR
and the top 3 bidders. Proposals were received from Texas Waste Management, CWD,
Laidlaw, BFI and IESI. Laidlaw did not meet all the requirements and BFI would not take
all the recyclables.
Mr. Smith continued. Any one of these companies represented tonight can provide
the service, and after this meeting, the council will have to decide what criteria they want
to use to award the contract, i.e., low cost only or service and track record.
Mike Carleton with HDR addressed the council. He was hired to evaluate the RFP's
and has worked with the city staff and committee to identify goals and needs. Staff did the
reference calls. Mr. Carleton then summarized each RFP from the lowest bidders, Texas
Waste Management(TWM), CWD and IESI. He pointed out the strong and weak points
of each company.
CWD - lowest bidder, primarily commercial pick-up experience, no landfill
IESI - second lowest bidder, no landfill, least experienced company
TWM - third lowest bidder, most assets, most experience and have their own landfill
Sludge hauling and disposal was not addressed in great detail because it will
eventually go to a regional composting site. It should not be considered as a deciding factor
in awarding this contract.
Councilman Longo asked if any of these bidders had any problems with how this
process had been handled and asked if everyone had been treated fairly. Representatives
from all three bidders; A1 Judciewicz (TWM), Mickey Flood (IESI) and Greg Roemer
(CWD) stated they were very satisfied with the process, that it was handled very
professionally and that staff had done due diligence is checking out references.
The consultant and the bidders then responded to questions from the council as
follows:
Weights of the trucks to be used and the impact on our streets. TWM - 28
yd, CWD - 27 yd. and IESI - 20 yd. Weights should be about the same and damage to
streets would also be about the same within any one of the trucks. There should be less
damage caused with newer models than with what is being used now.
Size of the recycling carts. They all offer 95 gallon carts. A 64 gallon cart was
not asked for.
Council was reminded that once the award is made to one of these companies, they
can still negotiate details with that bidder.
There will be a separate bin for recycling than for solid waste.
Landfills used by CWD and IESI. They both contract with Farmers Branch.
CWD has had a contract since 1980, which is renewed annually. IESI has contracted with
Farmers Branch for 2 years. IESI also uses the landfill in McKinney and Sanifill in Ft.
Worth.
Sludge hauling and disposal. All alternatives were looked at and whatever the
council wants to do is what any one of these companies will do. All three can handle it.
Again, Mr. Carleton stated this should not be a major, long term consideration in this
contract. Councilman Watts said we still need the costs for hauling and disposal.
Mr. Smith explained that the city can't do it until the centrifuge is installed, which
should happen in the near future. Councilman Dillard also stated this is not a main
consideration in this contract, because we will eventually haul it ourselves to the regional
composting site.
Rumors regarding CWD. They are not selling their company. The City of
Kaufman would not substantiate a rumor regarding poor service by CWD.
IESI - Youth of the company, lots of debt and start up costs. Mr. Flood gave
a history of the company and his professional background. Their debt includes start up
expenses that have been expensed, not amortized.
Mr. Flood continued, stating they bid the smaller trucks because they thought it was
important to the city and said if it is not, they can use larger trucks. They also offer a 50%
rebate on the recycling revenue, as well as 75 free roll-offs for use in city clean ups. Their
price includes ownership of the recycling carts and if that is not something the city wants,
the price can be lowered.
Replacement costs of carts - CWD - $60.00, IESI - $50.00, TWM - one free
replacement and then $65.00. General discussion followed regarding which recyclables will
be picked up. IESI was questioned. Mr. Flood said the list is negotiable and they can pick
up anything except #6.
Mr. Carleton advised the IESI proposal includes revenue and rebate on recyclables.
CWD - Greg Roemer addressed the council. CWD was awarded the city's
recycling contract in 1993 because they were the lowest bidder. Now The Colony has an
award winning recycling program. CWD is the low bidder this time on solid waste and have
met all the requirements of the RFP. He stated he does not think bulky pick-ups will be
as high as HDR's estimate of 60-80,000. They will provide a kick-off program, literature
and will place someone in City Hall to answer questions for the first 30 days.
Commercial pick-ups are not covered by this RFP. The City does not provide
that service. Each business handles their own contract, as will any apartment complexes that
come in to the city.
Lengthy discussion followed regarding bulky waste, costs, methods of pick-up etc.
It was noted that an automated system defines the space for solid waste, and the volume of
bulky waste may increase as a result.
TWM - Bob Keller addressed the council. Bulky waste has always been a problem
in The Colony. All three companies can do the job. TWM can offer the guarantee of
landfill costs through the life of the contract. He asked the council to look at some of the
points of their proposal and stated they would be happy to negotiate. Janice Brady
questioned the gate rate charge of $15.66. Mr. Keller advised the gate rate charge is just
a little over $6.00 not $15.66. Mr. Smith advised the guarantee of the gate rate charge
should have been included in their proposal. Negotiating is fine, but it would be great to
lock in that charge.
Landfill charge to residents. Farmers Branch does not allow private dumping.
TWM has a convenience center that is separate from the landfill for the use of residents.
IESI will provide a convenience center in the city for residents to use. Farmer's Branch
current gate rate is $5.10 per cubic yard.
Councilman Kovatch asked IESI the difference in price if a larger truck was
used. Mr. Flood could not say but advised there are three areas to be negotiated:
1. Ownership of recycling carts
2. Take out bulky waste charge and use "Pay as you go"
3. Change from 20 to 27 yard trucks - more productive
Mr. Flood said if these things are negotiable, then the price can be reduced.
Mike Carleton said he will get weights of trucks and ground pressure before the next
meeting. He will also clarify the numbers of sludge hauling and disposal.
Mayor Manning said this is on the agenda for Monday night and we need to decide
which company we want to negotiate with. Councilman Kovatch asked what the committee
members think. Mayor Manning advised that he needs time to digest the information given
tonight. The Mayor stated the council can award to one company, negotiate with them and
if details can't be worked out satisfactorily then work with another company. Mr. Smith
reminded the council that a decision needs to be made by the end of April when the TWM
and CWD contracts expire. Mr. Judciewicz with TWM and Greg Roemer with CWD both
said they will extend their respective contracts another 30 days so the city does not have to
rush through this process. They will both send a letter to the city stating their agreement
to extend.
Mayor Manning directed the City Secretary to poll the council to see when everyone
can be available to meet regarding this matter again, f~ D3-O ~'~ ~ '~--. _r> q~;: ~ ~ m ~
APPROVED:
will~m W. Manning, Mayor ~
ATTEST:
Patti A. Hicks,TRMC
City Secretary