HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/09/1989 City Council00355'i
MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON
MARCH 9, 1989
The Special Session of the City Council of the City of The
Colony, Texas was called to order at 6:30 p.m. on the 9th day of
March, 1989 at City Hall with the following Council roll call:
Don Amick, Mayor Present
Bill Manning, Councilman Present
Steve Withers, Councilman Present
Mike Alianell, Councilman Absent
Steve Glazener,Mayor Pro-tem Absent
Dick Weaver, Councilman Present
Joel Marks, Councilman Present
and with five present, a quorum was established and the following
items were addressed:
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION DOCUMENT AND
ENGINEERING PLAN FOR THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IN
EASTVALE
The minutes of this meeting were taken by a professional court
reporter. Please see attached transcription.
Transcription was not received in the office of the City Secretary until
the end of April, thus the page numbers are not in the correct sequence.
1 A P P E A R A N C E S
00855
2
3
4
5 City Council:
6 Don Amick, Mayor
7 Bill Manning, Councilman
8 Joe Marks, Councilman
9 Dick Weaver, Councilman
10 Steve Withers, Councilman
11
12 City Staff:
13 William M. Hall, City Manager
14 Patti Hicks, City Secretary
15 Mike Russell, Operations Manager
16 Tommy Turner, Director of Public Works
17 Bob van Til, Administrative Staff Planner
18
19
20 Also Present:
21 Mr. Larry Freeman, Consulting Engineer
22 Freeman-Millican, Inc.
23 Dallas, Texas
24
25
I o c o . s 0085 e
2
3 MAYOR AMICK: Notice is hereby given of
4 a special session of the City Council of the City
5 of The Colony, Texas, to be held at 6:30 P.r{. on
6 the 9th day of March, 1990, at City Hall, at which
7 time the following items will be addressed:
8 A public hearing on the environmental
9 information document and engineering plan for the
10 sewerage system imDrovements in Eastvale.
11 I need to read a statement regarding
12 the public hearing. "This Public Hearing is being
13 held to receive input for a project to install a
14 Sanitary Sewer Collection System in the area known
15 as the Eastvale Section of the City of The Colony.
16 The Sanitary Sewer Collection System is to be
17 funded through a loan under the Texas Water
18 Development Board's State Revolving Fund. The
19 loan is in the amount of $1,080,000.
20 Citizen's input is requested regarding
21 the Environmental Information Document; which will
22 be presented - the Engineering Design Plan, which
23 will be presented tonight, and the method of
24 repayment for this loan.
25 Repayment is proposed to be through a
1 user-based sewer fee to all residents of The
2 Colony, in a ~rojected amount not to exceed $1.15
3 per month per residence, over a period of the
4 loan, which is proposed to be twenty years.
5 The Engineering Design and
6 Environmental documents were prepared by the
7 engineering firm of Freeman-Millican,
8 Incorporated, and Mr. Larry Freeman will present
9 these documents and the potential impact of this
10 project on the City."
11 Is this public hearing in the nature
12 that would need a motion? Do we need a motion?
13 MR. HALL: Open by letting him make his
14 presentation.
15 MAYOR AMICK: All right, the way we
16 will proceed is that we will have a presentation
17 by Mr. Larry Freeman and following that
18 presentation, I will then open the meeting uD and
19 it will be a public hearing to hear comments from
20 the citizens.
21 Also, we will be recording all
22 comments through a court reporter, which is
23 required under this loan process, that we present
24 a documented legal transcript of the proceedings
25 of the hearing.
' 4
1 At this time, ~r. Larry Freeman will~6~0_0
2 make his presentation.
3 MR. FREEMAN: My name is Larry Freeman.
4 I'm with Freeman-Millican Consulting Engineers of
5 Dallas. We have prepared an engineering plan and
6 also an environmental information document on the
7 proposed project. I'll include, really, both of
8 those as I go through this and then, as the Mayor
9 said, we will have a Question and answer session
10 so that you can ask questions on it. I'll be here
11 to answer any questions and we need your input.
12 The project is for the Eastvale area
13 located in the City of The Colony. The property
14 adjoins Lake Lewisville. The area currently does
15 not have sanitary sewerage. It has septic tanks
16 and, because of the clay material that exists here
17 in this area and in The Colony area -- as a matter
18 of fact, it is impermeable clay. It is not
19 suitable for septic tanks unless you have lots
20 that are in the order of one acre in area or
21 more. So, obviously, the residents are having
22 problems with their septic tanks overflowing,
23 which is not too surprising.
24 The effect causes a potential health
25 problem for people that live there and also it
1 causes potential problems in that the overflow
2 eventually finds its way into Lake Lewisville,
3 which is a drinking water supply for the City of
4 Lewisville.
5 The project will be in an area that has
6 been piped and also that has streets already in
7 place. The selected project, the one that we
8 think is the most cost effective, is a project
9 that includes sewer lines that would run into
10 right-of-way of the street and also it will have
11 two lift stations; one located approximately in
12 this area and one located over in here
13 (indicating) that would collect the sewerage and
14 pump it back up into a gravity sewar that would
15 then connect into a thirty-inch, an existing
16 thirty-inch sewer, that's located -- that runs
17 along in this area. This lift station will pump
18 directly into the waste
19 water treatment plant.
20 As you know, the City currently has a
21 waste water treatment plant. It's called
22 Stewart Creek Plant and it was designed for an
23 average flow of two point five (2.5) millions
24 gallons per day.
25 The project does not have -- does not
6
1 endanger the habitat of endangered species. It is
2 not located in an area that we've had, from an
3 historical standpoint -- would be regulated. The
4 plant itself is, as I said before, set at two
5 point five (2.5) million gallons per day and, with
6 a population projection of -- in the year 2010 of
7 twenty-five thousand, one hundred and eighty for
8 the City of The Colony, the flow in 2010 to this
9 plant is not expected to exceed its capacity.
10 Also, the existing sewars in town will
11 not be affected. This thirty inch line is the one
12 that really affected it and we've done a capacity
13 study on it. We estimate that the caDacity of
14 that line is about twelve million gallons a day
15 and the flow, with ultimate development, is only
16 eight million gallons per day, so we don't have a
17 problem with that.
18 Therefore, we think that the waste
19 water treatment plant and the other sewers in town
20 are adequate for the population of twenty-five
21 thousand, one hundred and eighty, which is the
22 North Central Texas Council of Government's
23 estimate of the population in the year 2010.
24 We've studied four different
25 alternates, the first of which was to take no
7
1 action at all and keep it the way it is. The last
2 was to construct this particular system. The next
3 alternative we studied was to replat the area and
4 enlarge the lots to one acre and put septic tanks,
5 as they are today. And the fourth, for the City
6 to use the existing platted lots and install in
7 every household what is known as a
8 evapotranspiration system. Essentially, that
9 would take uD one-third of the lot, a fifty by a
10 hundred and fifty lot size, and it is fairly
11 expensive, about a hundred thousand dollars Der
12 lot.
13 We felt that the expenditure of a
14 $1,080,000.00 -- we have done a cost estimate on
15 that and we've done a cost estimate on the others
16 and it is the most cost effective. To replat and
17 remove and relocate folks, it would cost somewhere
18 in the $7,000,000.00 range. To put in an
19 evapotranspiration system, it would be somewhere
20 in the neighborhood of $3,000,000.00, so we feel
21 that's the most cost effective and best way to
22 pursue this project.
23 With that, I would --
24 MR. WEAVER: It's a million and eighty
25 thousand not a million eight thousand.
003568
1 MR. FREEMAN: A million and eighty
2 thousand, I'm sorry.
3 MR. WEAVER: Eighty.
4 MR. FREEMAN: Eighty, eight zero, one
5 0 eight zero, yes, sir, $1,080,000.00.
6 MR. WEAVERs Right. Just for the
7 record, $1,080,000.00.
8 MR. FREEMAN: With that, I would close
9 my comments. I would be open for questions and
10 answers at the public hearing.
11 MAYOR AMICK: What I would like to do
12 at this time is open the public hearing. If
13 anybody has any ~uestions concerning Larry's
14 presentation, please ask them now. If there are
15 those of you who want to speak in general on the
16 proposal, please hold that until we're finished
17 with the questions for Larry at this point in
18 time.
19 Does anybody have any questions over
20 the presentation by Mr. Freeman?
21 GENTLEMAN: Yes, sir. I don't
22 understand --
23 MAYOR AMICK: Sir, what we have to have
24 in this case with the court reporter, we will have
25 to have your name and address for the record, so
~ 9
00356'
1 please state that first and then go ahead and ask
2 your question.
3 MR. MILLSTEIN: I am Kurt Millstein,
4 4538 West Lake Highland, The Colony, Texas. I
5 wasn't clear on one of the alternatives, which
6 was --
7 MR. FREEMAN: The evapotranspiration
8 system?
9 MR. MILLSTEIN: Yes.
10 MR. FREEMAN: That is a system that is
11 very similar to a septic tank. The difference is
12 that it can be two or three different designs.
13 Essentially what you do is, you dig enough volume
14 out and replace that with sand. You take the clay
15 material out and replace it with sand and put the
16 septic system in the sand. You can plant a tree
17 or bushes or grass on top of that and essentially
18 it evaporates up and it also transpirates so it
19 goes out through the vegetation that's on top.
20 That's mainly a evapotranspiration system. It is
21 very similar to a septic system except you replace
22 the clay material, which is impermeable and will
23 not allow the water to go through, with the sand.
24 MR. MILLSTEIN: Well, you mentioned
25 that it takes one-third of the lot that is a one-
10
00356
1 fifty by fifty lot?
2 MR. FREEMAN: It takes about one-third
3 of that fifty by one hundred and fifty foot lot,
4 yes, sir.
5 MR. MILLSTEIN: I'm not clear on why it
6 takes so -- is that part of it useless at this
7 point? Could you use that area --
8 MR. FREEMAN: That area would still be
9 useful. That, by the way, just for the record,
10 meets the state health department criteria.
11 MR. MILLSTEI~: Did you say that was
12 like a $5,000.00 cost to the owner?
13 MR. FREEMAN: We estimated that as a
14 $5,000.00 cost.
15 MR. MILLSTEIN: To the owner?
16 MR. FREEMAN: To the lot, per
17 homeowner. I would guess so, yes.
18 MAYOR AMICK: Any further questions of
19 Mr. Freeman? Okay. Thank you, Larry.
20 At this time the public hearing is
21 open. If you want to address the Council with any
22 comments on this particular item, I need for you
23 to come to the podium and -- do you have a sign-in
24 sheet there, Patti? -- please sign and put your
25 name and address. We will wait for you. Don't
11
00886
i feel rushed.
2 MR. WALKER: I've already put my name
3 down. It's on the list.
4 MAYOR AMICK: Please repeat it for this
5 gentleman.
6 MR. WALKER: My name is Art Walker. I
7 live at 4816 Pemberton, The Colony.
8 In the beginning when the Eastvale
9 annexation subject first came up, the City Council
10 at that time repeatedly asked how much it was
11 going to cost the other people in the City of The
12 Colony and they were repeatedly told that it was
13 not going to cost anything.
14 Now, I realize that $1.10 a month is
15 not much, but that's over a twenty-year period and
16 I think there is a better way that you can finance
17 this than taxing all the people in the city.
18 The city has about $3,000,000.00 in CDs
19 stacked away in banks. Take a $1,000,000.00 of
20 that, go ahead and put this in and assess the
21 individual people that this is going to affect
22 because, when they get the sewer in, their
23 property values are going to go up and the rest of
24 the people in the city should not have to pay for
25 those property value increases that they're going
12
1 to benefit from.
2 I think it would be a better idea to
3 just make a one-time assessment and let them come
4 up with the money and then they could pay that off
5 in any manner that they chose rather than drag
6 this out over a twenty-year period because a
7 twenty-year period, this would break down into
8 something like about $1,500.00 per residence over
9 there. Over a twenty-year period, this is going
10 to amount to something like $3,000.00 or $3,200.00
1! and they could finance that individually much
12 cheaper than that.
13 Then, after the one-time assessment is
14 over, you could put your money back in the bank
15 and go on about your business. In other words,
16 get this taken care of without dragging it out
17 twenty years. Thank you.
18 MAYOR AMICK: Thank you. Anyone else
19 care to speak at this time?
20 MS. ABEL: My name is Melanie Abel.
21 I live at 8524 Lakecrest Drive.
22 It is my understanding that we cannot
23 assess the residents of the Eastvale Addition for
24 the repayment of the low-interest loan for the
25 installation of a sewer system. The Texas Water
13
1 Development Board says we cannot target an area,
2 but must include the entire City of The Colony.
3 We also cannot use our ad valorem taxes because
4 there simply are no excess taxes to be used.
5 When we became a part of The Colony, we
6 agreed to the tax increase from $.34 to $.74.
7 Therefore, we agreed to pay for the same things
8 the other residents of The Colony are paying for.
9 We pay for the improvement to the water system and
10 streets, for previous bonds, the Parks and
11 Recreation Department, the library, pool, et
12 cetera. There really isn't any excess money.
13 However, sewerage of the Eastvale
14 Addition cannot be delayed. It is only a matter
15 of time before the Health Department and/or the
16 EPA get wind of the situation. After all,
17 hazardous waste and raw sewerage is draining into
18 the lake or laying on top of the ground, not to
19 mention the inconvenience of not being able to
20 flush at random or go out in my own back yard.
21 It has come to my attention that
22 Eastvale versus Hawks lawsuit is nearing
23 completion. What will be done with this money?
24 Could it be used as part of the loan repayment?
25 After some extensive research, I feel I
14
00357
1 must support the city-wide assessment of not more
2 than $1.15 per customer per month.
3 Please let me state that nowhere in my
4 research did I find any agreements to a set amount
5 of money being put back into Eastvale. I believe
6 this was up for discussion or merely a verbal
7 agreement. Although, I understand that the
8 present Council is in agreement that this should
9 be done, the only agreements that I could find was
10 that The Colony would maintain the existing roads
11 and water system, the City of The Colony will,
12 within two and a half years, commence a master
13 plan for improvement and the City of The Colony
14 would employ a police chief, city secretary and
15 water manager. That's just to set the record
16 straight.
17 As far as The Colony not wanting to
18 help us pay for our sewer system, I'm sorry but we
19 are paying for your previous bonds. We're helping
20 you pay for the library and the pool. We're
21 helping you pay for things that we didn't get
22 benefit from before. Yes, we are benefitting now,
23 but we would like you to help bring us up to the
24 standards that you set. Thank you.
25 MAYOR AMICK: Thank you. Does anyone
15
003571
1 else have any inDut at this time? This is a
2 public hearing. Anyone may speak on this subject.
3 MR. SKINNER: My name is Jim Skinner,
4 4844, Pemberton, The Colony.
5 I guess the main thing I have a
6 question about this is the same thing Mr. Walker
7 brought up about the problems of including the
8 cost to any other members in the City of The
9 Colony for the sewer system over in Eastvale.
10 Having owned property in Eastvale and
11 also The Colony, I stand to benefit both ways and
12 lose both ways. I think, if this goes through as
13 proposed, I stand to gain a lot more than I stand
14 to lose, so on behalf of all the interested
15 parties in the City of The Colony that stand
16 around and gripe all the time about why this is
17 being done and why that's being done and all the
18 vacant seats you see out here, I think I've said
19 enough right there. Nobody particularly gives a
20 damn to come on out and take care of what they've
21 really got a gripe about.
22 With that, gentlemen, it's all in your
23 hands. Do the best thing you can with it.
24 MAYOR AMICK: Thank you. This is a
25 public hearing. Anyone may speak on this subject
16
1 at this time. If there are any other comments,
2 please come to the podium,
3 MS. ABEL: I would like to make one
4 comment.
5 MAYOR AMICK: Please come to the
6 podium.
7 MS. ABEL: I'm Melanie Abel. My
8 husband just sat there and figured up, if we all
9 continue and, say, we paid $1.10, the entire
10 Colony, each person, over twenty years that person
11 would pay $264.00. As I understood, from talking
12 to Bill Hall the other day, at this rate, as more
13 and more people moved into The Colony, the rate
14 would be decreased on down. Just to make that
15 public.
16 MAYOR AMICK: Thank you. Any other
17 comments at this time? If there are no further
18 comments, I will close the public hearing. I will
19 give you one last chance. Are there any further
20 comments?
21 MR. MILLER: I have a comment.
22 MAYOR AMICK: Yes, sir. Please come to
23 the podium.
24 MR. MILLER: My name is Dave Miller. I
25 live at 4524 Lake Highland. I have more of a
17
0 0 3 5 7
1 question versus a comment. I was wondering how
2 this is going to take place or what decision, who
3 will make the decision. I live in the old
4 Eastvale area and I'm interested in this going
5 through. I'm not clear on how it is going to be
6 proposed to the citizens of The Colony or --
7 MAYOR AMICK: Mr. Hall, could you
8 review the procedure that must be followed at this
9 point?
10 MR. ~ALL: Yes, sir. The process that
11 we're going through at this particular time, the
12 review and public input for the environmental
13 information document and the engineering design
14 plan, as was presented by Mr. Freeman, those
15 documents, along with a statement as to a proposed
16 financing of this loan of $1,080,000.00, that will
17 be presented to the Texas Water Development Board
18 not later than the 15th of March.
19 That is the first and preliminary step
20 in the application process for the money. If, at
21 that Darticular time, following the 15th of March,
22 the Texas Water Development Board will review the
23 documents that we have presented to them and, if
24 they find, in their words, that it is
25 administratively correct, they will contact the
18
00357
1 City and tell us that the loan has, in fact, been
2 approved and that we should at that particular
3 time proceed forward with a financial plan.
4 That financial plan will get with our
5 finance adviser, First Southwest, specifically.
6 We will lay out a proposed repayment plan for the
7 project that will be placed on the City Council
8 agenda along with the repayment plan. That will,
9 at that time, be acted upon by the City Council.
10 MR. MILLER: Does the Council have to
11 take any action prior to the presentation at the
12 state level on this item?
13 MR. HALL: No, sir.
14 MR. MILLER: All we have to present is,
15 this is the plan, and the whole process is
16 understood, that we will have to take final action
17 on it?
18 MR. HALL: Yes, sir, that's correct.
19 This is a preliminary action. At the time that
20 the application is approved by the Water
21 Development Board, then the Council will take
22 formal action to move forward with the actual loan
23 itself and the repayment process for it.
24 MR. MILLER: And that formal action
25 would be what?
' 19
00357' '
1 MAYOR AMICK: It would be by vote of
2 the Council. It would be a resolution or
3 ordinance which will require voting
4 of Council.
5 MR. MILLER: Okay, in a Council
6 session?
7 MAYOR AMICK: In a regular Council
8 session where we will call a vote, which is normal
9 procedure.
10 MR. MILLER: So there will not be a
11 city election?
12 MAYOR AMICK: Oh, no, sir.
13 MR. MILLER: And the Council, I
14 understand or I feel, anyway, thinks that this is
15 a good idea, the proposal that was made tonight?
16 MAYOR AMICK: I don't know the position
17 of the Council members. If they care to speak,
18 they may do so. They may want to reserve comment
19 until they've had an opportunity to review it and
20 consider it further. If they care to speak, any
21 one of them may do so at this time.
22 My preliminary feeling is that I would
23 like to be supportive.
24 MR. WEAVER: I would be supportive.
25 MR. MILLER: I'd like to hear that
I 20
00357b
1 because I think it is very necessary that
2 something is done about the situation over there.
3 We've known it was like that for a long time and
4 one of the things that was promised to the City of
5 Eastvale residents in one of the early meetings
6 was that we would be able to take care of that
7 easier if we went into The Colony and that's why
8 that vote went through by only four votes. Some
9 of the people didn't believe it and it was a close
10 election. Thank you.
11 MAYOR AMICK: Thank you. At this time
12 is there anyone else who would care to speak on
13 this subject? Last chance.
14 All right. I'm closing the public
15 hearing and, at this time, I will entertain a
16 motion to adjourn the meeting.
17 MR. MARKS: I would like to address a
18 question. The $1.15, is that the new figure? I
19 didn't hear. $1.08 or $1.107
20 MAYOR AMICK: That was a guesstimate at
21 a prior meeting when the question was raised by
22 Councilman Manning as to what would it be.
23 Someone proposed -- I think one of the
24 representatives proposed to Councilman Manning the
25 question what would it be if it was across the
I 21
00357o
1 city and it was estimated. I think $1.08 was the
2 number that I can remember.
3 MR. MARKS: That's correct.
4 MAYOR AMICK: But this is the actual
5 number since they've had time to work on it.
6 MR. HALL: We were very careful, in
7 the wording of this, to make sure that the
8 transcript -- in that it does say in an amount not
9 to exceed $1.15. It will be less than that, we
10 feel quite sure. But in order to make a formal
11 presentation and to comply with the Water
12 Development rules, we did have to establish an
13 amount of money, so we worked this out, an
14 amortization schedule. Along with the engineers,
15 we feel that the amount will be less than $1.15
16 per month per resident. However, better safe than
17 sorry.
18 MR. MARKS: Do you feel pretty certain
19 it will be less?
20 MR. HALL: Yes, sir.
21 MR. MARKS: I don't like the "not to
22 exceed" clause in contracts, but I guess --
23 MR. HALL: Again, the reason why we
24 went with that terminology is that this something
25 that will have to be acted on by Council at that
~ 22
1 particular time, the established rate of less than
2 $1.15, whatever rate it happens to be, will be
3 formal action by the Council.
4 MR. WITHERS: You mentioned a while ago
5 a timetable on this. When did you say we would
6 hear from the Water Development Board?
7 MR. HALL: We don't know specifically.
8 The only things that we do, in fact, or that we
9 are aware of at this particular time, is that
10 these documents that were addressed tonight, along
11 with the transcript that is being taken at this
12 time, must be in the hands of the Water
13 Development Board not later than the 15th of
14 March.
15 Following that and their review
16 process, they will notify us of any further
17 action.
18 MR. WITHERS: So by March 15th, we will
19 need to make a commitment one way or the other on
20 it; is that what you're saying?
21 MR. HALL: No, sir. The public hearing
22 and the presentation to the public of the
23 environmental information document and the
24 engineering plan and the proposal for financing,
25 those documents have to be in Austin.
23
' O0 ESi -
1 MAYOR AMICK: This may be helpful. If
2 I recall, all of us agreed that we should proceed
3 to the point -- to the break point where we have
4 to make the decision. In a prior meeting, we were
5 talking about assessments to the residents of the
6 Eastvale area only and we learned in Austin that
7 that was not legal, it would have to be city-wide.
8 Therefore, you have the proposal before
9 you for the city-wide. Following along with what
10 the Council said before, that we would go to the
11 break point where we had to make a decision,
12 therefore it was going on the assumption that the
13 city-wide cost would not exceed $1.15 and, when we
14 reach the point where we vote on it, that's
15 where the decision would be made.
16 MR. WITHERS: I guess the reason I'm
17 asking, I was just wondering if there is some way
18 we could maybe put some kind of referendum on the
19 ballot.
20 MAYOR AMICK: I would not support a
21 referendum because I think it is a decision the
22 Council has to make. I don't think we have the
23 time to do it. I would vote against doing that.
24 MR. WITHERS: What effect, or is it
25 going to have an affect, on the actual connection
24
00358z
1 of each individual to the sewer system and those
2 who can't afford it? What kind of rules -- are we
3 ready to set up some rules and regulations as far
4 as hookup is concerned, those who can't afford it
5 and pay out that? Is that set in place?
6 MR. HALL: No, sir, that is not part
7 of this process at this time. This is just an
8 exclusive that you install the trunk sewer line.
9 However, in response to your question, the staff,
10 again, has prepared, again, some preliminary
11 figures for that. The total number of residential
12 services in the area at this particular time is
13 two hundred and thirty-six. There are sixteen
14 commercial services. The total expense that we
15 have calculated at this time to install all of
16 those services is $340,700.00. Breaking that
17 down over the two hundred and thirty-six
18 residents, the average cost would be $1,443.65.
19 Again, let me mention what I have once
20 before. That average cost is the overall
21 connection and it will vary depending upon how
22 close a residence is to the street, if you will.
23 Thre are some residences over there -- and I think
24 North Horseshoe is one of those in particular --
25 where there are some homes that are set back in a
25
1 cul-de-sac three to four hundred feet. Therefore,
2 that particular residence is going to pay more
3 just simply because it is farther away from the
4 sewer line than some of those along Lake Highland,
5 for instance, that are closer to the road. That
6 is an average cost and is definitely not a per-
7 unit cost at all.
8 MR. WITHERS: Are we going to be able
9 to -- I know that when we got together with and
10 Southwestern Bell, they broke it out in quarterly
11 payments and made it affordable for everybody.
12 Are you going to be able to do this kind of thing?
13 MR. }{ALL: That is an action the
14 Council would have to take in a subsequent
15 meeting.
16 MR. WEAVER: Actually, that somewhat
17 depends upon the individuals, too, because the
18 Billy can put in his own, if he wants to, if he
19 follows the city guidelines. He may put it in for
20 just the cost of the pipe.
21 So somebody else, some elderly woman
22 who can't dig a hole, she probably will have to do
23 it -- so these figures that Bill is putting out is
24 largely dependent upon you, for most of it, as
25 individuals that can do what you want to do with
26
1 respect to that.
2 MAYOR AMICK: At this time, if there
3 are no further questions, I will entertain a
4 motion for adjournment.
5 MR. WEAVER: So moved.
6 MAYOR AMICK: Second?
7 MR. WITHERS: Second.
8 MAYOR AMICK: All in favor?
9 COUNCIL: Aye.
10 MAYOR AMICK: Opposed?
11
12
13
14 (Whereupon, the proceedings were
15 concluded.)
16
17 '
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
1 STATE OF TEXAS X
2 COUNTY OF DALLAS X
3 I, DAVID CHANCE, a Certified Shorthand
4 Reporter in and for the State of Texas, do
5 hereby certify that the above and foregoing 27
6 pages contain a true and correct transcription
7 of the proceedings described in the caption
8 hereof.
9 Certified to on this the /J~ day of
10 March, 1990.
12
DAVID CHANCE
13 CSR NO. 1006
Expiration Date 12-31-90
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DAVID CHANCE
23 618 Copper Ridge
Richardson, Texas 75080
24 214/234-0110
25
28
00358~
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Patti A. Hicks, City Secretary
[SEAL]