HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/25/1988 City Council MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON
JANUARY 25, 1988
The JOINT WORK SESSION of the City Council and the Planning and
Zoning Commission of the City of The Colony, Texas was called to
order at 7:30 p.m. on the 25th day of January, 1988 at City Hall
with following roll call:
CITY COUNCIL:
Don Amick, Mayor Present
Rick Harris,Mayor Pro-rem Absent
Johnny Spears,Councilman Present
Michael Robinson,Councilman Present
Steve Glazener,Councilman Absent
Harvey Bradley,Councilman Present
Marlene Poole,Councilman Absent
PLANNING AND ZONING:
Bob Fiumara, Chairman Present
Earl Brantley Present
Cathy Bock Present
Agnes Foster Present
Bill Sharp Present
Robert Doss Present
Tim Solohubow Absent
and with four Council members present and six Commission members
present a quorum was established in each and the following items
were addressed:
Mayor Amick opened the meeting by stating that he had met with
the Planning and Zoning Commission recently and there was a need
expressed to hold a joint Work Session with the Council. The
Mayor stated that he asked Chairman Fiumara to set the agenda and
noted that the agenda as listed could be broadened if necessary.
At this point Chairman Fiumara addressed the following:
1. DISCUSSION OF MEETING FACILITIES FOR PLANNING AND ZONING
Chairman Fiumara stated that when the Commission had met in
the old City Hall they always felt it was not a proper
meeting facility and had looked forward to using the new
building, going on to say that they were told after the new
building was opened that P & Z could not use the Council
dias for their meetings. Chairman Fiumara stated that the
Commission has had to meet in the classroom which is not
large enough, that they do not even have name plates for
identification and that staff has not been able to locate a
proper place for them to meet. The Chairman stated that
now, the Library meeting room has been recommended, going on
to say that P & Z members pay taxes and that they want a
proper place to meet. Member Sharp noted that the manner in
which the tables are set up in the classroom makes it
difficult for all members to have a full view of the
audience. Member Foster stated that the impression of the
City should be professional and the manner in which P & Z
has to hold their meetings is not.
Mr. Bill Hall, City Manager explained that the Library
meeting room had been suggested because it is large enough
to accommodate 30 to 40 people, the table is large enough to
accommodate the entire Commission and felt it would be an
appropriate permanent meeting room for P & Z. Member Sharp
stated that sometimes there are more than 30 to 40 people
present, such as in the case of the 205 acres.
Mayor Amick asked if there are times when P & Z conducts
Public Hearings and then other times when they hold work
sessions. Chairman Fiumara stated that was correct. Mayor
00286,
Amick suggested that when P & Z holds a Public Hearing, they
could use the Council dias for professional appearances and
that when the Commission holds a work session they should
continue to meet in the classroom so that there would be
room to spread plans out on the table, etc. Member Brantley
stated that he felt there should be room in both cases to
spread out plans. After a brief discussion both Council and
P & Z agreed on the Mayor's suggestion.
2. DISCUSSION OF PACKET PREPARATION FOR PLANNING AND ZONING
A. PREPARED IN A TIMELY FASHION
B. ALL NECESSARY INFORMATION INCLUDED
Chairman Fiumara stated that the Commission wants the packet
ready by close of business on the Friday preceding the
meeting on Tuesday, going on to say that on several
occasions they have requested not to have more than one
Public Hearing on the same agenda and that on the agenda for
the meeting on January 26, there are two Public Hearings.
The Chairman went on to say that staff should check with the
Commission before setting the agenda and that sometimes all
the necessary information is not included in the packet.
Chairman Fiumara gave an example of a case coming up for a
full service night club, stating that staff has recommended
approval after reviewing the site plan, traffic and parking.
The Chairman asked why the Police Department had not checked
this business out before it came to P & Z. Mayor Amick
asked why the police should do this and the Chairman said to
determine the activity by the business. Mayor Amick asked
what the police department signing off on this would mean.
Chairman Fiumara stated it would mean that the man meets the
police department laws. Mayor Amick said that other
businesses and stores are not checked out in that manner,
but they are just asked about their policies, going on to
say P & Z should check these things out not the Police
Department, noting that would discriminatory.
Chairman Fiumara stated that the check list was not being
completed properly and that it should be in order to cut
down the time necessary to process a zoning request.
Chairman Fiumara cited several examples in which he felt
staff has not completely researched information and checked
the list. Mayor Amick asked if all the questions were
answered by staff then what would be the need for P & Z.
Chairman Fiumara stated to catch things that don't get
noticed by staff and the engineers. Mayor Amick asked if
there was an established check list and the Chairman said
the City had paid for one twice. Mr. Hall stated that the
first list prepared was a work sheet not a check list, going
on to say that staff does have a check list they use.
Member Sharp stated that C.O.G. says that P & Z is a work
force the City uses to ensure that everything is complete,
ie. plans, etc. before being presented to the Council and if
staff can get more information together before P & Z reviews
it that would result in P & Z being able to make things
easier for Council, which would ultimately be easier for
staff to handle problems.
Councilman Robinson asked to what extent P & Z is to make a
decision, for example asking the police department to do an
investigation of a particular business. Mayor Amick stated
that this type thing is beyond the realm of P & Z going on
to say that P & Z should check out 1) traffic, 2) location,
3) occupancy, 4) fire exits, and 5) parking. The Mayor said
also that P & Z should asked specific questions regarding
the business policies. Mayor Amick then said he does not
disagree with the check list, but feels it may be too
extensive, going on to say that if staff does too much
detailed research and P & Z then feels no.questions are
necessary, the City could get caught. Chairman Fiumara said
the zoning applications are not always complete and the
basic check list is not being done.
Councilman Spears stated there seems to be some animosity
and if there is no reason why the check list should not be
used then if there is a r~commended form to use it. Member
Bock said that Bob van Til had told them there was a list
that Department Heads check off on but they have not seen it
is writing, they only get the information verbally. Mayor
Amick said there needs to be a clear understanding of what
the check list is and what it is to be used for.
Councilman Spears said to quit haggling over past issues and
move forward, stating perhaps the Council has never met with
P & Z and given them direction. Mayor Amick stated that
really the Council can't do that because P & Z is bound by
the Zoning Ordinance. There followed a lengthy discussion
regarding how much information was necessary to make a
valid, sound decision. Mayor Amick stated that P & Z should
draw up a list and go with it.
Member Brantley asked if the Council sees pertinent minutes
regarding special issues from P & Z meetings. Mayor Amick
said he feels they should not see the minutes to make a
decision, going on to say that it should come to Council as
new information. Member Brantley asked if a development
comes in and meets all the requirements, but P & Z sees a
way to enhance the City, could that be requested by P & Z.
Mayor Amick stated they could recommend those changes and
that they should.
Chairman Fiumara stated that P & Z approved a preliminary
plat some time ago, final plat is now before them, and staff
advises it falls under the new rules. The Chairman said he
asked staff to check with the attorney to see which rules
apply. Mayor Amick stated that if the preliminary plat was
approved under the old rules by Council then it is
grandfathered. Chairman Fiumara agreed, but said that staff
disagreed and had put in some changes, ie. 17' alley instead
of 15'and drainage. Mr. Hall said that change regarding
drainage had not come from F & J but from the engineer
because the past criteria was not adequate and the engineer
was asked to re vamp the plans. Mr. Hall went on to say
that even though it was approved 14 months ago, it would
cost the city more in the long run, stating he had spoken
with Joe Luciani and Bill Allen of F & J and they both
agreed with the changes in drainage. Mr. Hall said the 17'
alley request is a mistake. Mr. Hall went on to explain the
drainage problems in that area. There was a lengthy
discussion regarding this plat. (Northpointe)
Chairman Fiumara said not only in the case of Northpointe
but anytime something is approved under the old rules can
the City then asked the developer to come up to the new
standards. Mayor Amick said he was anticipating a legal
question and he should not do that. There was a lengthy
discussion regarding the Northpointe development and its
progress, with Member Bock stating they had been delayed for
3 months. Mr. Hall said F & J was asked not move dirt until
the drainage plans were in. Member Bock said F & J was
calling P & Z members because they could not get the answers
from staff. Mayor Amick said P & Z should advise developers
to call the Council or Mayor and then they would contact the
City Manager regarding such problems.
Mayor Amick summarized by saying that a check list should be
drawn up , the packets should prepared completely and in a
timely fashion.
Member Brantley again asked how P & Z can bring up bettering
the City to a developer, ie., the northern development needs
a better roadway than the engineers call for. Mayor AMick
said it can be brought up in the meeting and then if it
meets a dead-end, send it to Council as a requirement to get
Council approval. There followed a lengthy discussion on
how P & Z can negotiate with developers to enhance beauty
and quality of life in the City. Member Brantley said if we
had a Master Plan it would b helpful. Chairman Fiumara
asked if Council and P & Z could meet and go over the
current Master Plan and Thorough Plan to set some 5 - 10
year goals. All agreed and scheduled another meeting
February 8, 1988 for Council and P & Z. Mayor Amick
instructed Mr. Hall to bring the Master Plan to the January
30, 1988 retreat to review.
Chairman Fiumara asked for guidance from Council regarding
what is wanted in the City with regard to apartments. Mayor
Amick said the feeling has always been that apartments will
be south of 121. Chairman Fiumara then said that there some
things on the books (Code) that should be reviewed and
removed, ie. duplexes, 1500 square feet minimum. Councilman
Spears and the Mayor both agreed these should be reviewed.
There was a discussion regarding limiting liquor stores or
any other business in the City. Mayor Amick stated it is
not right for a governmental body to restrict any particular
business.
3. DISCUSSION OF THE USE OF MORE WORK SESSION OR PRE-
APPLICATION MEETINGS FOR PLANNING AND ZONING TO REVIEW PLANS
Chairman Fiumara said that P & Z has found that holding a
work session with developers before hand can be very
beneficial, stating that recently a developer came in to a
work session and stated that a Councilmember had seen the
plans and had stated they would be O.K., going on to say
that should not happen. Mayor Amick said perhaps the
developer was just trying to put something over on P & Z
and cautioned that elected officials should not review plans
with a developer and give any approval, but should remind
the developer that he/she is only one vote, going on to say
that then the information should be passed on to P & Z.
Chairman Fiumara said he feels P & Z should meet with
Council before the case comes up for consideration. Member
Foster asked what the Council liaison is for. Mayor Amick
said that he feels the pre-application work sessions are for
P & Z and stated there are certain steps to be taken to
process a case, going on to say that if the Council is at
the P & Z work sessions then why have a P & Z Commission.
Councilman Bradley agreed, stating that C.O.G. says Council
should not even see cases before they come to the for final
approval with recommendation from P & Z. Mayor Amick said
the Liaison should attend the P & Z meetings by invitation
only and not to address a specific agenda item, going on to
say the problems such as the check list should have taken to
Councilman Bradley. Member Sharp said the liaison should
attend every meeting in audience so he can relate to Council
what can't be recorded on tape or in the minutes. Mayor
Amick said those things should be brought to Council by P &
Z.
At this time, the Mayor called a brief recess.
4. DISCUSS ROLE OF LIAISONS:
A. COUNCIL
Mayor Amick stated this had been covered earlier in agenda
item No. 3.
B. STAFF PLANNER
00286z
of Denton~C~ntral Appraisal District. ~,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th , day of January , 1988.
Don Amick, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patti A. Hicks, City Secretary
Councilman Harris moved to approve the Resolution as written
and Councilman Robinson seconded the motion which carried
with a unanimous roll call vote.
8. CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH COLLIN COUNTY TO EMPLOY
CONSULTANTS TO ASSIST IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE HIGHWAY 121
Mr. Bill Hall stated this item had been discussed at the
Work Session on January 11 and explained that the purpose of
the agreement is to hire consultants to expedite the process
of right-of-way acquisition along 121, going on to say that
several cities have entered into the agreement. Mr. Hall
said that The Colony's portion will $600.00. Councilman
Poole moved to approve the agreement and Councilman Spears
seconded the motion. Councilman Poole pointed out that
Collin County has spear headed the efforts on 121
improvements. Mayor Amick commended Collin County for their
efforts. The motion carried with a unanimous roll call
vote.
With no further business to address, Councilman Harris moved to
adjourn and Councilman Bradley seconded the motion which carried
with a unanimous roll call vote.
Mayor Amick adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. APPROVED:
i /1
Doh~-Am-ick, M~br' '- f
ATTEST:
Patti~A.. Hicks, City Secretary
[SEAL]